Showing posts with label Global Warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global Warming. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

AGW: More Unsettled Science



Have you noticed lately how many stories that are reaching the “mainstream” media debunking the whole global warming/climate change scam? A sure sign this hoax is headed toward history’s dustbin is the virtual irrelevance of chief scammer Al Gore and the growing evidence of data refuting the wild-eyed claims of Gore and his leftwing accomplices.
Well, there’s another breakthrough today as the San Francisco Chronicle is reporting snowfall in the Sierras has remained consistent over a 130-year span despite the hysterical claims of those who’ve perpetrated this massive fraud on a gullible public.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Global Warming Causes Whale Poop

Global Warming causes Polar Bears to get hot and fall down stupid. On the ice.
Global Warming causes the Ozone Layer to go pphffssst.
Global Warming causes everything to get cold. A lot.
Global Warming causes professors to stutter. Mid lecture on Global Warming.
Global warming causes cows to poof. Or is that backwards?
Global Warming causes terrorists to explode which is good if they’re at home.
Global Warming causes celebrities to giggle girlily. Like Al Gore.
Global Warming causes bad Hollywood movies. Like Day After Tomorrow or An Inconvenient Truth.
Global Warming causes hurricanes and Nino's and Nina's relationship to run hot and cold.
Global Warming causes drought. Especially when it rains a lot.
Global Warming causes whale poop. Whale poop fights Global Warming.

Is there anything Global Warming can't do?

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Obama & Allies Try To Defend High Gas Prices


Senate Ally Defends Obama on Gas Prices

Mr. Bingaman, chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources committee, noted that at a hearing earlier in the week, a panel of energy experts collectively dismissed the claims that either climate policy or the pace of offshore oil permitting were driving gas prices higher.


Really? You mean the 896 billion barrels of oil we can't touch here in America would not have affected gasoline prices (even if you figure in the virtual ban on building new refineries)?


As Delbert says, "If you can't lie no better, you might as well tell the truth."

Saturday, March 12, 2011

The US Has Only 2% Of The World's Oil Lie

I read this on Pundit & Pundette and it speaks for itself.

"We can't escape the fact that we control only 2% of the world's oil." This is a common refrain among anti-drilling Democrats and environmentalists, and it's repeated enough that many people accept it as true. In reality, it's 100% false. The number comes from a highly conservative estimate from the Energy Information Administration totaling America's proven reserves where we are already drilling. It does not include the 10 billion barrels available in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It does not include most of the 86 billion barrels available offshore in the Outer Continental Shelf, most of which President Obama has placed under an executive drilling ban. And it does not include the 800 billion barrels of oil we have locked in shale in Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado. Those shale resources alone are actually three times larger than the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia, so the claim that the U.S. only has 2% of the world's oil is clearly false.

Chicken Littles Already Blaming Japan's Earthquake On Climate Change

Yep, like doggies with a bone these people will not let anything shake their belief that puny men are killing mother eath.

Some Respond To Japanese Earthquake By Pointing To Global Warming

“Some islands affected by climate change have been hit,” said Nilsson. “Has not the time come to demonstrate on solidarity — not least solidarity in combating and adapting to climate change and global warming?”
“Mother Nature has again given us a sign that that is what we need to do,” he added.


Hey Joe, Mother Nature calling collect. Oy vey...

Sunday, February 06, 2011

Obama + Greenies = Disaster For America

Obama has stopped 1/3 of America's energy supply in the Gulf. A coalition of 89 "green" groups, who make a ton of green off people like Obama, want to stop Canada from building a pipeline to the US that would bring in millions of barrels of oil.

Big Green groups tell Obama to tell Canada to Drop Dead

Together they have set out to destroy our economy. Why do we tolerate them?

Friday, January 28, 2011

Enviromental Expertise Worth About A Buck Two Ninety Eight

And that amount of environmental expertise is funded with billions of our dollars. Somebody is gettin' screwed.

Himalayan glaciers not melting because of climate change, report finds

Himalayan glaciers are actually advancing rather than retreating, claims the first major study since a controversial UN report said they would be melted within quarter of a century.

The environmentalists do have the UN on their side, but what could go wrong with that?

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

LaGuardia 48 Hours After The Storm


LGA - AA Terminal 12/28/2010
 The storm hit and the preparations and recovery were bungled badly. We were lucky to be on a flight that wasn't cancelled and actually took off.

LaGuardia airport and others reopen, but stranded fliers still face ordeals


These are the same government officials that support Obama's takeover of our lives.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

The Cap And Tax Trade Crowd Support Space, Sutton And Other Liberals In Ohio

The crowd that brought us Cap and Trade now is working hard to protect their extremist friends in Congress so they can pass even more environmental taxes. They, nor their congressmen, care that it will cost people money they can't afford and they don't care that their "science" is bogus.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Action Fund says new poll data shows that voters in regions with competitive House races prefer incumbent Democrats who support legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

The group’s survey looked at 23 congressional districts where the incumbent House Democrat voted in favor of last year’s contentious cap-and-trade bill. However, the survey did not specifically reference that bill or use the term “cap and trade” in questioning.

Their Ohio friends are Steve Driehaus (Ohio-1); Mary Jo Kilroy (Ohio-15); Space (Ohio-18); Betty Sutton (Ohio-13) and John Boccieri (Ohio-16)

Friday, October 01, 2010

10-10 Global Warming Extremist Sickos

No wonder so many progressives and liberals side with terrorists. They're just as sick and violent.

http://www.1010global.org/no-pressure

Whippersnapping climate campaign 10:10 teams up with legendary comic screenwriter Richard Curtis - you know, Blackadder, Four Weddings, Notting Hill, co-founded Comic Relief - and Age of Stupid director Franny Armstrong to proudly present their explosive new mini-movie "No Pressure". The film stars X-Files' Gillian Anderson, together with Spurs players past and present - including Peter Crouch, Ledley King and David Ginola - with music donated by Radiohead. Shot on 35mm by a 40-strong professional film crew led by director Dougal Wilson, "No Pressure" celebrates everybody who is actively tackling climate change... by blowing up those are aren't.



Next they'll have hilarious videos of those who disagree with them having their heads being sawn off with dull knives. Yeah, that'd do it. Especially if they have a green flag, say like Earth First, and some numbnut reading a manifesto just like real terrorists. We're all chuckling just thinking of it.

Monday, August 09, 2010

Environmentalists Causing The Worsening Blackouts.

And they are just making the problem of the lack of power worse.

U.S. electricity blackouts skyrocketing

Smart grids, modernization and gimmicks are what are being offered in the article (I encourage you to read it), but what is not being offered is reality. The United States needs more power plants, more refineries and more sources of power such as nuclear, coal and oil. The very things that so-called environmentalists have prevented for 20 plus years. And in those 20 plus years, through government interference and predatory lawsuits, the cost of producing power has risen astronomically as the avenues to produce any viable amounts of new power has shrunk.

Just as they have been doing to the health care industry these groups have emplaced rules, regulations and legislation to make citizens suffer financially for their energy wants and needs so that citizens will see no other way out, but to bow to the dictates of the government. That is not freedom, but tyranny. It is tyranny no matter how benevolent the tyranny believes itself to be. And health care reform, Cap and Trade and the energy crisis are just the beginning.

Friday, August 06, 2010

Enviro Mentals Want To Kill Another 174,000 Coal Jobs

They not only want to reach in the pockets of coal workers and steal their pay they also want to steal money from all the other people that use energy to go to work, work, live and purchase any product in America.

Cap and Trade alone will cost the average household in America about $1,800 and this will cost far more:

Peak coal could happen by 2011... if we don't start any more mines!

The paper just released by Tadeusz Patzek at The University of Texas at Austin and Gregory Croft at the University of California, Berkeley is limited to looking at production from existing coal fields and mines, which is expected to start declining after 2011. Of course, this is only a problem if no new coal production is started, something that is not expected for many decades to come.

Total coal-related jobs

There are approximately 174,000 blue-collar, full-time, permanent jobs related to coal in the U.S.: mining (83,000), transportation (31,000), and power plant employment (60,000). (See below for details on each sector.) The U.S. civilian labor force totaled 141,730,000 workers in 2005; thus, permanent blue-collar coal industry employees represent 0.12% of the U.S. workforce.[1] (Compare this percentage with the 1.89% of U.S. workers who worked in coal mining alone in 1920.)

This total does not include indirect employment - workers who are not directly employed in the coal industry, but whose jobs are supported by that industry. It is entirely possible that thousands - even tens of thousands - of workers are indirectly supported entirely by the coal industry. However, the National Coal Association's 1994 estimate that the coal industry directly and indirectly employs around 1.5 million people[2] seems exaggerated. The level of indirect employment is in the low hundreds of thousands - not in the millions.


Monday, July 12, 2010

Air Conditioning To Be Used As Social Engineering

Air conditioning is good for some, indeed necessary, but bad for all and especially bad for Mother Earth. Don't worry, the big gov guys have it all worked out who will have it and who won't and they also have it all worked out how those without will knuckle under to meet the needs of the few and of Mother Earth.

In the heat wave, the case against air conditioning

Washington didn't grind to a sweaty halt last week under triple-digit temperatures. People didn't even slow down. Instead, the three-day, 100-plus-degree, record-shattering heat wave prompted Washingtonians to crank up their favorite humidity-reducing, electricity-bill-busting, fluorocarbon-filled appliance: the air conditioner.
 
This isn't smart. In a country that's among the world's highest greenhouse-gas emitters, air conditioning is one of the worst power-guzzlers. The energy required to air-condition American homes and retail spaces has doubled since the early 1990s. Turning buildings into refrigerators burns fossil fuels, which emits greenhouse gases, which raises global temperatures, which creates a need for -- you guessed it -- more air-conditioning.

A.C.'s obvious public-health benefits during severe heat waves do not justify its lavish use in everyday life for months on end. Less than half a century ago, America thrived with only the spottiest use of air conditioning. It could again. While central air will always be needed in facilities such as hospitals, archives and cooling centers for those who are vulnerable to heat, what would an otherwise A.C.-free Washington look like?

The author also finds benefits for Tea Partiers and conservatives. Read the rest and try to think just how well this will play out across the nation and the world. South Central LA? Paris? Atlanta? Yeah, with no air conditioning cries of "drill baby drill" will be replaced by "burn baby burn." Think of the politics of unintended consequences.

Friday, July 09, 2010

3 C Train Or The Big Green Drain

Train, Spain and drain all have one thing in common, they make things go broke.

Why Cities Are Broke or, There is Something Tragic About a Train...

... or a light rail system or a streetcar boondoggle that just makes people (well, pols and their civilian enablers) wet their pants over the prospect of tossing 19th-century technology and 21st century debt obligations at cities and states and countries that are already dead broke.

And so witness the spectacle of Cincinnati, a city that is down on its luck and its population, faces a $50 million deficit next year, and is home to the worst mascot in the history of professional sports (see right), anxiously awaiting signs that the feds will shovel some money their way in a ridiculous plot to build a streetcar system in the Queen City:

Read the rest.

When will the world realize that "green" means money in a bad way, at least how it is envisioned now.

Saturday, July 03, 2010

Let's Bring Green Jobs To Ohio Now...Be Greece Later

The Green Party, which is another way of spelling the Socialist Party, want to do to us what Greece, Portugal, Spain and other have done to themselves (using our money).

Let's Bring Green Jobs To Ohio Now...Not Later

Greens want to help millions of Americans obtain a green-collar job that pays a living wage while helping to build a brighter environmental future.

5 million Green jobs will help us stabilize our national economic crisis and the global climate. Green jobs can conserve energy and lower greenhouse gas emissions. Green jobs are union jobs and created in communities that really need them. Green jobs nourish our communities because they can’t be outsourced overseas cheaply. Green jobs grow local businesses and foster community development.

GREEN SOLUTIONS

1. Support massive public investment to create 5 million green jobs in fields such as energy conservation, renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, green building and the construction of mass transportation.

2. Create an inclusive program to train workers for the new, clean energy economy.

3. Prioritize the creation of green jobs in communities of color and low income communities.

3. Support union organizing at all workplaces.

4. Adopt a reduced-hour 35 hour work week as a standard.

5. Establish more federally funded programs for Green jobs development and skills training.

Dennis S. Spisak-Green Party of Ohio nominee for Governor
 
Yep, let's create millions of new jobs with millions (and millions and millions) of tax payer money and then give them to unions and low income and minority communities, then reduce the work week to 35 hours so we can establish even more federally funded green programs. Uh, it ain't working anywhere it has been tried.
 
A candidate that puts forth this platform will not be in danger of getting elected because a candidate is supposed to suggest the boondoggle after they're elected not before.
 

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

War & Restrepo

A book and a film.

I got this information from Blackfive and I strongly suggest you go and read what Blackfive writes. Few times do I look forward to current books written about the military and even fewer times do I look forward to current films about the military because they are many things, but not really about the military and what soldiers really stand for. Both the book War and the film Restrepo are ones that I will search out.

I am leaving in a minute to first find the book.

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Why Not Ohio? Low-Carbon Mass Transportation Not Wanted

Those that love big government live big government solutions the people do not want. Case in point, Low-Carbon Mass Transit which is a fancy version of saying mass transit.

Buses, trains, trolleys, subways, light rail and other versions are used in densely populated areas for rush hours twice a day and run empty the rest of hours in service and sit idle nights. Most Americans do not live in densely populated areas such as urban environs, but in smaller cities, towns, villages and suburbs. It is the suburbs that really ticks of the progressives, especially the inhabitants independence.

These people calling for mass transportation desire the demise of the automobile and if it irks those pesky Americans who do not share their vision  it makes the idea more attractive. That big government elitists get sniffy when their lessors don't agree only makes them scream things like "global warming", "save the environment" and "low-carbon mass transportation" as scare tactics.

They have two problems: first, they've screamed this nonsense for so long that nobody believes them any more and secondly, people don't want to be dictated to and they will not give up their independence. Actually, there is one more problem in that the visionaries will scream, "but they must!" which make people reply, "screw off." Not a learning moment of dialogue.

Personally, I love trains. I have ever since I first rode on a train as a child. I hate what government has done to trains through union boosting legislation, their dreadful train designs and and their complete mismanagement of Amtrak. Just like Amtrak, health care, corporate take overs and other invasions of private lives and business, the government will screw things up. If you put the government of charge of the Gobi desert there will be a sand shortage within months. The bigger the bureaucracy the less efficient it is and our government (re)proves it with each new day.

Why not Ohio? Because we hate mediocrity, bad service, high prices and the loss of our independence. In short, we hate bureaucracies, their supporters and their attitude. Leave us alone. Please.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Waxman: Condemn, Pontificate And Thank You BP For Coming To The Lynching

This "hearing" is nothing more than a push to a new "energy policy" with cap and trade included which, when combined is nothing more than a progressive attempt to grab more power and money from citizens. Using Waxman as the lead speaker is, well, dubious. Waxman couldn't convince a pig to wallow in mud, but he would pass legislation to make the pig do so. After berating the pig's ignorance and the need to intervene.

Why Not Ohio: My $1.2 Billion Walk

Our bike trail is extremely busy with approx 15 riders a day and possibly 30-50 riders on weekends that can whisk their way to nowhere past beautiful statues made especially for the path. I think that's worth a couple hundred million.

Obama administration spends $1.2 billion on cycling and walking initiatives

In March, Mr Obama's transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, announced a policy "sea change" that gives biking and walking projects the same importance as automobiles in transportation planning and the selection of projects for federal money.

Maybe we could start farming some wind and have geothermal drinking fountains right next to this transportation project so we can get even more money. What if we add cute puppies. And kittens!

Thursday, June 10, 2010

The US Senate's Constitution Change Showdown

In the name of Mother Gaia or, more likely, trying to keep the loony left in line, the Obama Administration and his fellow thinkers in Congress want to subvert the US Constitution and give illegal power to an agency of the federal government. That the ruling given to EPA is patently foolish as well as an economic destroyer is besides the point. The EPA should not have this power nor should Congress abrogate their duties, but in the name of feel-good politics and not wanting to embarrass President Obama and themselves they are trying to stop the legislation cited below.

Climate change showdown

The president is threatening to veto a resolution from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) that would ban the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating carbon emissions.

But if the president were forced to use his veto to prevent legislation emerging from a Congress in which his own party enjoys substantial majorities, it would be a humiliation for him and for Democrats on Capitol Hill.
 
So Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and other Democratic leaders are doing what they can to stop it.

Every senator that votes against this bill should be voted out of office at the first opportunity. No one can balance a questionable idea such as global warming or whatever the fools are calling it now by destroying the balance of power within our government structure.