Sunday, July 31, 2011

Is Anders Behring Breivik a Christian?

Agnostu Akbar!

Saturday, July 30, 2011

President Snippy Pants Lectures Republicans For Passing Legislation

Yeah, he lectures all of us as if he knows it all when he hasn't a clue. Oh, he also doesn't have a plan. When was the last time Democrats passed a budget? I purposely didn't say a responsible budget because the last time they did was when General Jackson was a Boy Scout.
Robert Stacy McCain nails it:

And the only question now is whether President Snippy Pants will get away with this transparent trickery.

Well said Mr. (Other) McCain, well said.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Boehner Did It! Reid Will Undo It.

Y - 218
N - 210

A Balance Budget amendment scares Democrats. It means they'll actually have to be honest. That alone could kill the party.

Absolute Best Plan To Stop Deficits

Warren Buffett, in a recent interview with CNBC, offered his solution for all this drama about the debt ceiling:
"I could end the deficit in 5 minutes," he told CNBC. "You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election."

Excellent Discussion About Anders Behring Breivik And Silliness

Posted By Barry Rubin On July 26, 2011 @ 11:21 pm In Uncategorized | 44 Comments

Once one gets beyond the polemics and clich├ęs, there is a huge amount that could be learned from an honest discussion about the mass murders in Norway. Let’s look at some of them.

An editorial in the New York Daily News contains both valid points and dangerous silliness. It begins:

In his ravings, Anders Behring Breivik, confessed to having murdered 76 people, repeats a familiar refrain: He killed to save his country, his continent and Western civilization itself from an attempted takeover by Islam.

The trouble with a 1500-page manifesto is that one can find almost anything in it. For example, people, groups, and sites who have been cited once or twice in that manifesto are now being called complicit with the murders. In the case of one group in that position, Breivik actually attacked them for being non-violent! Another author in the United Kingdom had two articles footnoted by the killer that didn’t even deal with Islam. Now people are being incited to go after her in revenge.

Of course, Breivik did see Islam as a threat, but he didn’t attack mosques, he attacked two government targets: a camp of the ruling party and a government building. Thus, the main target was not an “Islamic takeover” but his view that the country was being destroyed by left-wing policies, of which unlimited immigration is one. I have no agenda in making that point, but it is surprising that this hasn’t been a bigger focus of the discussion. Breivik was not a single-issue guy.

A second question is whether his violent action “proves” that there is no such problem regarding Islam. Radical Islamist violence is not mindless. It is a response to a problem. Many view this problem as the oppression of Muslims. My opinion is that it is a strategy for revolutionary takeover, a radical Islamist government, and the fundamental transformation of society. Of course, this is far more likely in Muslim-majority societies.

The Daily News continues:

Breivik’s belief is the photo negative of al-Qaeda’s contention that the United States and its allies are hell-bent on destroying Islam.

That’s a clever point and has some merit. But after studying Islamism for 30 years, I’d say that equally or more important — and certainly the one used more in inner and sophisticated Islamist circles — is the idea that the real crime of the West is “preventing” Islamist revolutions by supporting existing regimes. On this one, they are right generally. The first argument is propaganda; the second is programmatic.
To argue that Western governments want the Islamists to win and take over their societies is paranoid. To argue, though, that Western governments follow bad policies that make it look that way has a lot of merit. Left-wing movements — as in Norway — hope that the Islamists will benefit them. They are wrong. An analogy here is the Communist Party in Germany (at Stalin’s orders, of course) arguing that the growth of the Nazis would benefit them at a certain point. They were dead — literally — wrong. That doesn’t mean the Communists were pro-Nazi, it meant that they were disastrously stupid.

But the next contention of the editorial is more questionable:

The belief, that Islam at large conspires to triumph over all Judeo-Christian society, is a delusion.
Of course, the trick here is to say “Islam at large,” that is all the Muslims, everywhere and all the time. So yes the extremists on the Breivik channel do help the people who say that the threat is a “delusion.” But if radical Islamism gains hegemony and then largely controls the dominant devision of contemporary “Islam,” then it will be no illusion at all.

For now, we know that large elements of Muslims — especially revolutionary Islamists and notably the Muslim Brotherhood as well as the far less significant al-Qaeda — want that triumph because they say so all the time. So do Hamas and Hizballah and Iran’s government, less often perhaps but often a lot. They can quote extensively from Islamic texts — the same ones that “counter-jihadists” point out — and thus persuade Muslims a lot more easily that they represent “authentic Islam” than can moderate Muslims.

That’s one big reason why “reform” or “moderate” Islam is so weak. Others include the fact that the radicals are willing to kill and intimidate people, have more supporters, and have more money.

What most decidedly isn’t a delusion is:
  • Revolutionary Islamist movements seek to take over all Muslim-majority countries.
  • Where they have taken over they seek to transform those societies permanently into Islamist-run dictatorships. Iran and the Gaza Strip are the two most prominent current examples.
  • Revolutionary Islamists seek to wipe Israel off the map and expel Western influence. In practice, they also seek to get rid of Christians. Their seizure of power is against Western interests.
  • In Western countries, Islamists seek to gain hegemony over Muslim communities both ideologically, religiously, and through instituting Sharia.
  • More speculatively, they dream of total conquest. Of course, that is more speculative, less likely, and far longer-term.
The fact that the last paragraph is pretty unlikely does not invalidate the previous four paragraphs.

A lot of the discussion among “anti-jihadists” is based on quoting from Muslim religious texts, clerical interpretations, and political statements by Islamist groups. The mass media simply refuses to deal with this evidence. That’s why the arguments can easily be labeled fantasies. Yet if you can provide dozens of quotes and hundreds of actions as examples, who is it engaged in “paranoid and poisonous fantasies”?

I partly agree with the editorial’s statement that:

Demonizing a religion rather than those who pervert it is destructive and only wins sympathies to radical fanatics.

I wouldn’t use the word “pervert,” which implies the Islamists are lying. They are using material that actually is in Islam and if one doesn’t understand that then one is powerless to deal with it. But there’s also a nice irony in the quote: which “radical fanatics” are we talking about? The editorial no doubt wants to refer to radical fanatics like Breivik. It is also true, however, that it wins sympathies for the “radical fanatics” who deny that there’s a problem. And those people are far more powerful than the murderous Breiviks, a group that one can count so far on the fingers of one hand.

In fact, the editorial then proves my point:

Counterjihadists are fighting an imaginary enemy. In the United States Muslims constitute less than 1% of the population. In Europe, it is about 7%….[Muslim immigrants]…seek to practice their faith and to assimilate.
The editorial — and the mass media generally — defuses a serious discussion by making the only issue as to whether Muslims will take over. But the immediate dangers are different.

First, will the pool of potential terrorists and their supporters grow? We can add up attacks that total far more than the one in Norway. When, for example, a convert is inspired to murder a military recruiter in Arkansas or a radicalized Muslim opens fire at Fort Hood, this should be a warning bell. Will the number of attacks steadily increase?

Second, will Muslim communities be taken over — or at least the most energetic activists in them — by radical Islamists? There is real reason to believe this has been happening in many places. While one can show to a far more limited extent that “creeping Sharia law” in the West is affecting non-Muslims, it is certainly affecting Muslims.

And when, to cite just two examples, the Archbishop of Canterbury and a leading judge support the imposition of Sharia law on Muslims in Great Britain, can anyone call that a delusion?

Third, Muslims who want to “assimilate” may be targeted or even killed by Islamists, who might be receiving state subsidies. Virtually every “honor killing” is against a woman who wants to assimilate. And since moderate Muslims are few, subject to intimidation, and receive little or no support from the Western establishments, those who often control these communities inhibit assimilation and teach people not to do so.
Any Muslims who are secular in their behavior, want to stop being Muslims, or who believe themselves properly religious but disagree with the extremists are being victimized.

When a woman is murdered in an “honor killing” or has her rights trampled on by Sharia as radically interpreted, she is also a Muslim. Often, governments have turned these people over to control by the radicals. They also finance the radicals, either because of the looseness of Western laws, misguided “multiculturalism,” or a conscious belief that helping radicals who aren’t committing terrorism this week will ensure there won’t be terrorism in future.

Fourth, there are real decisions to be made: Should public schools allow prayer (only, in the US) for Muslims? Can women wearing a veil have that picture on their driver’s license? Are cab drivers going to be allowed to refuse seeing-eye dogs? Will governments register polygamous marriages and give social welfare benefits on that basis? What is the definition of practicing their faith?

And then non-Muslims are being affected by being forced to observe Sharia law in an increasing number of cases, small in the overall extent of society, yet narrowing the freedom of those who experience it.
The final sentence of the editorial says:

Those who see “Muslim domination” and “creeping Sharia law” around every corner are imagining things. Their fictions only feed extremism.

True enough. Nobody should see anything “around every corner.” But saying that the problem is only imaginary and ignoring the real problems is also a fiction that will “only feed extremism,” including Islamist extremism, the triumph of the most radical interpretations of Islam, and extremists who want their own societies to decline.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Sweet Nonracist Terrorist Wanted To Kill Infidels At Ft. Hood Right After His Kiddie Porn Fix

LEFTISTS -  ALERT! To the ramparts! Racists are at it again!!

Racist gun nut store owner alerts racist government officials who have racist police and military thwart a planned new attack at Fort Hood while racist TV station and racist announcer reports on the story about a peace loving sweet boy who is a Muslim and wanted to kill a bunch of people. Sweet Pea, who was arrested officially on child porn charges, also had bought a bunch of nonracist guns, nonracist ammo and nonracist bomb making material to kill white infidels who don’t like being killed by radical Muslims nor being called racist by nonracist Americans who at the same time call Israelis Nazis and terrorists.

"Any Muslim who knows his religion or maybe takes into account what his religion says can find out very clearly why he should not participate in the U.S. military," Abdo said then.
I guess this clears up the Mohammed question over little girls and boys because Abdo didn’t cite anything in the Quran against child porn.

Some nonracist over at DU couldn't wait to post this:
Sigh. More fodder for the people who hate Muslims. But I have to ask, if they are
going to condemn all Muslims for the actions of a few, why don't they blame all Christians for Timothy McVeigh and the crazy Norwegian mass murderer?
See how easy it is to keep spreading lies?

I Support Operation United Front

Leftists in America finally learned, like a slow child, that attacking soldiers doesn’t work as it appeared to during the US involvement in the Vietnam War. From Reagan to G. W. Bush soldiers returned to being heroes and the left’s demonization of our warriors fell by the wayside. With nowhere to go the left started attacking those that support our soldiers, their mission and America itself.

As that support grew to include opposition to Sharia law in America and Islamofascism everywhere those working blogs, those who wrote posts and articles and all that support conservative ideals were attacked and accused of everything and anything whether true or not. Most of the attacks were outright lies.

Psychopaths who attempted murders, assassinations and other crimes were falsely portrayed as conservatives when actually, if the criminal had any political persuasion it usually had a left tilt. It didn’t matter to leftists though because they had planted the seed of “conservatives are evil and sick” in the public’s mind. They produced bogus lists of “conservatives” who were Nazis, Aryan supremists, racists, anti-Semites and other derogatory terms to spread on websites, television, radio and magazines and newspapers.

Presently, we have the case of Pamela Geller and Howard Spencer and others who are being blamed for the horrors that occurred in Norway because they have warned of the creeping Sharia and radical Islam here in America, Europe and the free world.

You can read about it here:

At the end of the piece you can also join in the effort to support Geller and Spencer, et al., and fight against the leftists who are behind the false attacks on all conservatives. Please join in the support of Operation United Front.

It is a curious yet informative exercise to watch what happens when attacks on conservatives are proven wrong whether it is a comment taken out of context, a twisting of facts or whether it is an outright lie.

Many times the untruth continues to spread through leftist sewers like Democratic Underground in the hopes that it will become a “truth” as in speaking truth to power or some such nonsense. Even when a “truth” has been proven a lie, individual leftists, in concert with their peers, try to turn the argument to a subject not even being discussed. If one, say, mentions a toast to the troop the Leftist will rail against alcohol complete with accusations of alcoholism or being a dry drunk or if a person says that a personal attack is nuts the Leftist accuses them of dementia or comes up with an opinion study about the mental instability of conservatives.  The off-subject attack is more than a tacit admission that they have nothing to offer to the debate, it is also an admission of self applied social elitism that, in their mind, allows them to preach and tell others what they must do. Then they will lie and say that they said no such thing and try to scrub the Internet proof that they actually did. That is how obsessively in-control they need to be. It is also a sign post pointing to their ignorance of the real world.

The funniest part of this sad attempt to demonize of supporters of the War on Terror and the troops fighting in-country is when leftists devolve into a parody of fools calling conservatives fat carnivore alcoholics, addicted to nicotine (or some variation based on lifestyle) who will die very soon because we are too stupid to live. All mixed with other name calling such as Nazi, Fascist, hick, rube, red-state moron, etc, and vulgarities and sexist slurs. That is how they fight the “hatred” they say represents conservatism. That’s funny.

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Happy Birthday To Mr. President The Unemployed

Jill at Pundit and Pundette speaks to the narcissistic leader of the free world as opposed to the community organizer of personal campaigning. Go to Ed Driscoll's to get his take on this moronic and callous slap to those unemployed.

Classy understated cake

Classy Birthday Bash Decorations

Since our Dear Leader can do the impossible, like destroying the world's economy, he can bring back the dead such as "The late Marilyn Monroe" for a classy rendition of "Happy Birthday" to not only publicly slap the unemployed in the face, but also the wife .

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

The Left Says Pamela Geller And Robert Spencer And The Right Were Responsible For Slaughter In Norway

How can this be news? Well, the Left has been spouting this claim (with their little Leftist puppets who get out their cut and paste tools to help in the spreading) for so long they probably believe it now.  Savants will then pile into comment sections of various blogs, forums and other places they’re still allowed to comment in and quote other Leftists to ensure that they are not alone as a way to further spread the lie.

They say politics is even more polarized now, but politics has always had liars and dirty campaigners.  No more and no less than now.

UPDATE: Various LibProg commenters on different conservative sites jumped on the bandwagon to now portray conservatives as haters of humongous proportions by comparing them to National Socialist German Workers' Party, aka Nazis, thus proving Godwin's Law once again. They are childishly doing so because Breivik, Nazis and supposedly conservatives hate minorities. How many minority people did Breivik kill? How many were Muslim?

UPDATE II: Right on cue the sockpuppets and mere puppet savants show up to not answer any question, but to repost their cut and paste comments that have already been rebuffed more than enough to make the original writers and their articles unreliable. That the Leftists that continue to repost the lies they become liars themselves. They know that, but don't care because the meme they push is all that is important to them. They are not honest liberals, new or traditional, to be respected of which there is legion. No, they regurgitate the same lies they have borrowed or stolen from other websites that have been cut and pasted from other sites that knew they were lies, but posted them as truth because that is all they have. They have noting else. They can't say that Breivik killed any Muslims because if he did the Norwegian government would be screaming about it. They say that conservatives hate government, Muslims and immigrants when they know this to be a lie. Conservatives want smaller government, legal immigration and are definitely opposed enough to fight radical Islamofascist Muslims that have murdered worldwide including over 3,000 here in America.

“I think it would be a good idea if President Obama faced some primary opposition.”

Says the left's ultimate leftist, Bernie Sanders, in a story about Obama's crumbling base. Better the Demos be rid of him, but that won't change that somehow Bush will be blamed. That's all the left has left. Blame. Bush.

Oh, they still have Bernie and Barbara Lee who is actually less intelligent that Sheila Jackson Lee and a host of wunderkind, but Wu's counting anymore.

Monday, July 25, 2011

For Leftists This Economy Is No Mistake

Two simple graphs, updated daily, that show exactly how screwed the federal government's finances really are.







It has been said that the LibProg Dems have no economic plan. They do and we're in it which is part of their change for America. No new taxes, no more lifting the debt limit, no more spending sprees. Time to cut and then cut more and keep on cutting.

Norway: I Blame Classical Music Lovers

Atlas Shrugged has an interesting report on Anders Behring Breivik. She also asks who put Christian and conservative on his Facebook page.

FWIW, I see it was a crazed batnut classical music lover who killed all those innocent people. I condemn their out of control hatred. It's time to stop them.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Obama's Czech Problem

In my email...

Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting an inexperienced man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama Presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their President. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their President."

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Billion Here & There Or How To Bankrupt A Capitalist Economy

Yeah, I know, "tax the rich," but there aren't enough rich anymore. So, tax the corporations, but since corporations don't really pay taxes there isn't any money there either. The poor? Well around 50% of the people in this nation no longer pay much in taxes except when corporations get taxed more and then the poor have to pay more in a hidden tax because corporations don't really pay taxes. So what do our geniuses in academia and government do? They buy corporations and point to charts and studies showing just how grand it will all work out!

U.S. loses $1.3 billion in exiting Chrysler

Obama and ilk are doing this on purpose to achieve their end and they don't care how we feel because they have charts and studies that show they must destroy capitalism and America to save America. I wish they'd all just go to hell and leave us alone.

They're either morons or traitors and I believe they are both. Oh, and they're academics which makes a perfect trifecta for failure. Babes at the betting booth and when they fail as predicted then the horse will get shot. At least in their world. I'd turn that around.

December 1941 By Craig Shirley

A friend and a scholar. A book about a day that will live in infamy for more than just the cowardly attack on our forces stationed at Pearl Harbor. Buy it and read how America changed forever. It is fascinating.

Black Genocide

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Harkin Barkin' About Fringe?

Tom Harkin hasn't ever been a stable boats. He tends to bob here and slip side there and now he wants to call members of the Tea Party a "cult fringe."

"The debate and fight is not between Democrats and Republicans. It's between some Republicans and their sort of cult fringe as I refer to them out there," Harkin said.

I'd say that someone who lies about their war record in Vietnam and supports Hugo Chavez is a member of a cult fringe. A seriously nutso lying cult fringe.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Stupidity & A Quid Pro Quo Of Governance

In fairness if this idea passes then each city official should lose $1,000 of their salary for every death caused by a bullet the tax and the official didn’t stop.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Forget Jimmy Carter, Obama As Bad As Woodrow Wilson

The last time Standard and Poors downgraded America's credit rating was in 1917 under the racist and socialist President Woodrow Wilson.

Things stay the same. Only the names change.

Twit In A Snit Or Why Obama Left The Table

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Obama: Give Me The Money Or Grandma Gets It

Obama can't guarantee that Social Security checks will go out to seniors. Really?

How many bad movies does this type of juvenile behavior bring to mind.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Teachers: The Tests Made Them Cheat

Reports have been coming in about teachers nationwide involved in cheating on students tests and test scoring. Georgia's then Gov Sonny Perdue didn't believe the internal school district whitewash and ordered a full investigation. The findings are shocking and "investigations" in the other state should be reopened to find if there are other scandals this pernicious, especially now as we have to endure teachers and their unions scream that collective bargaining is really just for the children.
Atlanta cheating scandal: Should educators face jail for 'robbing' kids?
The headline asks the question and yes, educators should be jailed for long sentences for robbing children of their future. This is a crime that denied education, but also taught students that it is okay to cheat, get passed on without merit and that lying is the norm of adults.

The investigation should also extend to education and union leaders that say that testing made them do it. They aren't worthy of the honor of being called teacher and are actually common liars and thieves. Throw away the key.

Instapundit's Brilliant Idea!

WANT NEW SOURCES OF REVENUE? If I were a Republican member of Congress, I’d be proposing big excise taxes on movie tickets, DVDs, CDs, digitial movie and music downloads, etc. Then let Hollywood scream about how the tax increase would destroy American jobs. . . .

A fancier approach would require knowledgeable accounting advice, but would target the various bits of favorable treatment those industries get in terms of deductions, but that’s hardly necessary.

Monday, July 04, 2011

Government Caused Shortages, Shoddy Care & Rising Cost Are Easily Predicted

Using a simple formula for government service availability, cost and quality projections is actually simple.

If private enterprise can supply a product or service government entrance into that area will cause shortages, quality issues and a sharp rise in cost.

My father told me at the advent of Medicare/Medicaid to not become a doctor because with government involved the cost of medical care would go through the ceiling while the quality went down the crapper. He was right then and it is about to get a whole lot worse.

July 4th Is Independence Day

Jabberin' Joe To Go & Cuttin' Cuomo To Come

This is politics, so dump on Joe and pander to New York. How's he gonna keep California in the fold?

That's the ticket!

Sunday, July 03, 2011

Safe And Legal Abortion Has Given Us 300,000 Breast cancer Deaths

It just keeps getting worse. If the physical destruction of a baby isn’t sufficient to convince people maybe the continuous flow of the true effects of abortion on the surviving women will spur a real debate.

Abortion Has Caused 300K Breast Cancer Deaths Since Roe

This is on top of targeted abortion of girls, African-Americans, the coerced and born babies. This isn’t safe and legal. How could a holocaust be legal, let alone safe?  

Friday, July 01, 2011

Cold War To Begin Anew

And it's going to be very cold.
Russia to deploy 2 army brigades in Arctic
If the morons preventing the US from drilling for energy here could be stopped from spewing their lies this wouldn't be as bad as it appears it will become. Yeah, I know, the greenies will not give up the billions they make with this environmental crap.

Abortion's Safe And Legal Tripe Ignores Some Facts

I consider Zilla of the Resistance a friend. She is also persistent, smart and a very good researcher which is important when looking into the true story behind the darling of leftists, abortion. It is hard to find facts that place the wholesale slaughter of babies in proper perspective because those that control media, education and politics do not want anything that might put abortion in a bad light out there for true debate.

Zilla nails it.

The Other Victims

Read the whole post, but this is appalling to any who are aware of medical procedures:

* 65% suffer symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome
* 31% suffered health complications, some of which are life-threatening
* 65% higher risk of clinical depression
* Death rates from all causes are 4.5 times higher
* Suicide rates are 6 times higher

Any other medical practitioner would be jailed for taking part in such medical malpractice.

The King Of Rock & Roll Wants To Be The First Rock & Roll President

Since the media has the hots for presidential firsts, black, female, illegal alien and so forth, why not the first rock and roll president. How about a man that can intertwine Greek philosophers, Iggy Pop and constitutional law into one sentence when illuminating his ideas? That'd be Thaddeus George McCotter.

Federal Court Rules Racism To Continue

I remember back when I was doing research while working in DC I came across some startling figures about race, race relations and "help" from the federal government. Prior to interference by the federal government the rate for illegitimate birth was about 12% by white mothers with a much lower rate for black mothers. Upon further research I learned that this was due to a strong family and church bond existed in black communities and that was the rub because blacks lived in black communities. When I suggested that living in adversity made those bonds stronger which in turn made the bond between families and church, ergo morality, stronger. I was thoroughly excoriated by my client who had a different finding in mind. he wanted to highlight that after 20 some years of federal help the percentage of illegitimate births among black women was then twice that of white women. I quit.

A few months later I had the great honor to spend a few hours with the economist Dr. Walter Williams. As a young man, I was hoping to impress Dr. Williams with knowledge and brought up my thoughts concerning blacks, federal help and the decline of the family. Dr. Williams quickly proved me way wrong as he pointed out that my snippet of information was, but a small part of how the federal government was destroying blacks, indians and all minorities. I still remember him spitting out that the federal government was filled with liberal do-gooders that were the most racist pricks in the world (the good doctor had a tart vocabulary). He went on to describe the destruction of the black economy, the black family and the destruction of blacks as individuals through "help" from the government.

On the subject of blacks and education, let's just say he said that, blacks (and whites) were being taught some serious poppycock that was making them less productive and less intelligent. He, being an educator, made me feel this was the most egregious of the racist and wrongs of all the sins of federal "help."

This racism, a soft version of low expectations and an intimation of inability on the part of blacks is still alive and well and is still ensconced in the minds of liberals.

Mich. ban on race in college admissions illegal

Racism is wrong even when a court practices it, but is especially so when courts not only over rule the electorate, but try to codify racism. This ruling should be overturned in a higher court.