Newark

Mr Missing Million$ Is The Gift That Keeps Giving

Jon Corzine was almost the treasury secretary and was an Obama favorite until he lost a ton of money in a suspicious manner.

Jon Corzine Still Bundling for Obama

Thought to be thrown under the bus Corzine appears to be buying back his old seat at the front of the bus.

Big(ger) Government

Clooney To Join Obama For $3 Dinner. Lassie And Horand von Grafrath Decline.

Prez wasn't enough draw. At $3. Reports of dwindling number of Blue Dog Democrats labeled suspicious.

Richard Bunkall

Columbus Avenue

More Liberal Love & Name Calling

I'm pretty sure it is apparent who is brain dead. I mean that in the nicest way.

Anti-Israel Flytilla A Bust

Pro-Hamas activists fail to pull off stunt in attempt to humiliate Israel who actually got the last laugh. Again.

Dear activist,

We appreciate your choosing to make Israel the object of your humanitarian concerns. We know there were many other worthy choices.

You could have chosen to protest they Syrian regime's daily savagery against its own people, which has claimed thousands of lives.

You could have chosen to protest the Iranian regime's brutal crackdown on dissent and support of terrorism throughout the world.

You could have chosen to protest Hamas rule in Gaza, where terror organizations commit a double war crime by firing rockets at civilians and hiding behind civilians.

But instead you chose to protest against Israel, the Middle East's sole democracy, where women are equal, the press criticizes the government, human rights organizations can operate freely, religious freedom is protected for all and minorities do not live in fear.

Therefore we suggest to let you solve first the real problems of the region, and then come back and share with us your experience.

Have a nice flight.

Obama's Falklands Fail

Our professor professes his love.

His knowledge of diplomacy is only eclipsed by his lack of diplomacy.

Romney 48-Obama 43 With UPDATE

And this is the second daily which actually shows Romney pulling away. But.

Fools and rank amateurs have been screeching fool ass comments about this poll or that poll for weeks now. For the most part these morons don't even know what tabs are let alone know how to read them. They see an article, written by someone paid to state stupid things to gin up readership, stating this or that according to this poll or that poll and show their intelligence by saying something even more stupid than those they are quoting.

There is a difference in the way conservatives and liberals use polls. Conservatives use polls to not only gauge support or lack of support for issues, but also to test messaging. Liberals do this to a degree, but mainly use poll results, mostly skewed because they are push polls, to drive memes such as, "We're winning!" or some such nonsense.

Even political beginners know the worth of a poll that gauges yesterday's feelings. Others, not so much and they are the fools screaming the loudest. The election is more than 6 months away, but I will find great joy in continuing to identify who are the biggest fools of all.

UPDATE: Right on cue in the comments.

Game over...


Seriously, you can't make this stuff up.

Liberals Doing A Quayle In The Headlights

Why is it that progressive liberals, losers all, are trying to avoid speaking of their war on women? I know, as you, that they have tried once again to lay this at the feet of conservatives, but even a moron knows that history will show that childish liberals find fun in belittling women.

Kleefisch- even by liberal standards, Wisconsin progressives have shown themselves to be pigs.

Palin- liberals are on record being pigs, liars and totally reprehensible in their speech about her.

Bachmann- liberals sunk to a new low, which they have surpassed, with their descriptions of her.

Haley- liberals have skimmed the pond scum of their own minds to attack her.

Clinton-Obama should have been brought up on charges.

Why is it that liberal/progressives get away with being total pigs, especially while projecting their small, nee, little, prowess? 

Headlights are shining on incapable men finally being called out by incapable women about being incapable. Quayle and deer are laughing their ass off.

Of course, Hilary Rosen isn't. She's still digging deeper for a career so far gone even a bunch of dried up boring narcissistic professors who bore dried paint can't revive. Of course they don't care about her, they have their Sweet Jane lives to protect and a loser who pulls back the mask just isn't good enough for their precious brie and small talk at little universities salting this land.

The headlights are on the brie because the rats are scattering. Typically so. Without spell check these liberal/progressive pigs couldn't spell potato. But they'll squeal if called on such, away from the lights because, like rats, they hate the light.

Napolitano Responsible For Trayvon Martins Death

Via Doug Ross


Why not? Everybody else has already been convicted of Martin's death.

Who Is Responsible For Trayvon Martin's Death?

So, why not Janet Napolitano?

JANET NAPOLITANO SIGNED 'STAND YOUR GROUND' LAW FOR ARIZONA IN 2006

Shame on you Janet! Indict yourself. Now.

What Progressives And Liberals Really Think Of Women

Via Legal Insurrection

How many vile and disgusting things must progressives, liberals and democrats have to say before the main stream media has to say, "no mas" and start unmasking them? How long? A long time because the media feels the same way which is why they cover for these animals.

This time it is about Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch of Wisconsin. Warning, this is a progressive which means the language is vile and disgusting.

This John "Sly" Sylvester is a hack and tries to substitute shock for talent. He has no talent and he no longer shocks. He just saddens people that our airwaves carry his sick message.

Toledo

Obama Is Desperate That We Be Distracted From His Record

And with good reason. His record is a disaster for the country and now it appears it is also a disaster to his re-election.

War On Distractions

Mixed in with the economy, the price of gas, food inflation, the abject and laughable green economy and his war on women (don't even mention the DOJ and and other leftist agencies such as the EPA), Obama ain't got long game.

Obama As Reagan: Even Lefties Are Laughing At Him

Who could actually keep a straight face? The Gipper would be laughing his butt off too.


John Dickerson explained Obama’s rationale and the GOP retort: “By using that Republican icon he’s trying to paint Mitt Romney and his Republican colleagues as so unfair that even Ronald Reagan wouldn’t agree with them. Republicans point out that when Reagan called for fairness it was part of a much larger tax cut and tax reform programs that Barack Obama probably would not support.”

Liberal Lynch Mob Beyond The Pale Still

Even some on the right jumped the gun on justice and are now blaming their words on a liberal media. This is the same media which has a narrative that it pushes and a hidden narrative that it refuses to print. The hidden narrative is called the truth and this hidden narrative cannot be printed because the voter would vote differently if it becomes known.

Why I Called George Zimmerman a Murderer, and Why I Was Wrong

I took the media’s claims at face value and erroneously labeled George Zimmerman a murderer based upon false information that was designed to arrange a lynching.

I won’t get fooled again, and I hope that prosecutor Angela Corey, who dismissed the grand jury this week, won’t fall into the same trap of trying to pursue a narrative instead of true justice.

The entire racist chorus that leaped to sing their hustled hate should be ashamed. But they won't, they'll just smile that smile of the smug know-it-all.

Also: Liberal Lynch Mob Beyond The Pale

Bunch Of Old Guys Want Real Science

Oldsters, BC (Before Computers), want NASA to stop New Age science for real science. Of course, real science doesn't meet green science standards.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Blanquita Cullum 703-307-9510 bqview at mac.com

Joint letter to NASA Administrator blasts agency’s policy of ignoring empirical evidence

HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012.

49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.

The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.

H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS.

“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward. “There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”

Select excerpts from the letter: 

§  “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”

§  “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”

§  “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”

The full text of the letter:

March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science

CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center

Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change.

/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years

/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years

/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years

/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years

/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years

/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years

/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years

/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years

/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years

/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years

/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years

/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years

/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years

/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years

/s/ Anita Gale

/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years

/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years

/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years

/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years

/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years

/s/ Thomas J. Harmon

/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years

/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years

/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years

/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years

/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years

/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years

/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years

/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years

/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen

/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years

/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years

/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years

/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years

/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years

/s/ Tom Ohesorge

/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years

/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years

/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years

/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years

/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years

/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years

/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years

/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years

/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years

/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years

/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years

/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years

/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years

Can't beat'em with a hockey stick.

57 States. 58th Named 'Despair'

Having a constitutional scholar in the White House is fabulous, except when it's not. Having a SCOTUS rubber stamp a "popular" constituted law is pretty damned good, except when it's not.



So, ObamaCare is so popular it was passed by big margins? Maybe, Obama thinks it was a bipartisan huge victory with votes as huge as a 57 state margin. In Illinois, Cook County's Department of Dead Motor Vehicle and Voting Rights (CCD DMVVR) was so excited they brought along their friends in 7 additional (and a yet unnamed state) to pass even more "popular" legislation even though they didn't know what was in them.

Obama never named the 58th state, which at the time he still hadn't visited, but it is named the State of Despair and we're living in it.

Easter!

Lefties To Bring 'Arab Spring' To US

This should be good. What could go wrong with a plan put together by Obama pal Van Jones who wants to destroy our Republic and replace it with a socialist utopia?

Van Jones group plans American’s “Arab Spring” revolt

Once ready, the group and dozens of others, notably MoveOn.org and labor unions, will launch the “99 Percent Spring” offensive against government and financial centers.

“We're at a crossroads as a country. In recent years, millions have lost their jobs, homes have been foreclosed, and an unconscionable number of children live in poverty. We have to stand up to the people who caused of all this and confront the rampant greed and deliberate manipulation of our democracy and our economy by a tiny minority in the 1%,” said Caroline Murray, of Rebuild the Dream Innovation Fund, in the organizing email.

Oh yeah, they want more Dodd-Frank Act, more economic wrecking balls like Barney's Fannie/Freddie stopping any form of NINJA restrictions and so many other Greek-like socialist programs. They want larger ponzi schemes like SS. They want more government handouts. They want their noses wiped, fannies soothed and everything for free. They want socialism.

Will the American people accept an "Arab Spring" here? We shall see, won't we.

Liberal Lynch Mob Beyond The Pale

Insty nails it. The entire racist chorus that leaped to sing their hustled hate should be ashamed. But they won't, they'll just smile that smile of the smug know-it-all.

INDEED: “It is likely that, if not for conservative new media, the misleading edit, which inflamed racial tensions in the Martin case, and which was repeated by Stetler’s own New York Times, would have gone unnoticed and uncorrected. As it is, the producer responsible for the edit at Today has been fired, but the individual who made the same edit to the earlier MSNBC story (since corrected) has not been identified or disciplined. Nor has anyone at any other outlet or network — many of which made similar selective editing choices — been punished.”

Plus this: “The questions are only just beginning on Editgate. The release of the news of the firing just before the holiday weekend smacks of a cover-up; more than that, we know that the edit itself was not restricted to the Today show. Brian Williams and the brass at NBC News must provide answers. They are responsible for editorial output, not an unnamed producer. And they must be held responsible for an irresponsible and dangerous edit apparently deliberately designed to twist the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman story along racial lines.”

I remember when people who exploited racial tensions for political gain, and inspired crowds to lynch-mob levels of fury, were considered beyond the pale of civilized society. Personally, I think they still are.

Coal Union Bosses Campaign Against EPA...

Obama's EPA, which is decimating our economy and jobs, is slammed by a union boss who then goes on to praise Obama.

Mine union boss: Coal industry could suffer same fate as bin Laden

And they're curious as to why unions have been losing membership for decades?

Voter Fraud Does Not Exist Except...

It's rare except when it isn't which is every time somebody takes the time to look. Like this time:

'Bout That Money We 'Loaned'

In a February 28 speech, President Obama referred to this expenditure of $80 billion as a bet on the American worker, and added: “Now, three years later . . . that bet is paying off, not just paying off for you, it’s paying off for America.” His implication that the bailout is succeeding-that it will not ultimately be a loss for taxpayers-is a constant theme of Democrats.

Conservative Moms Rock!

Thanks to All Voted in the Top 25 Political Moms Contest!

The conservatives rocked and my fave, Zilla, came in 6^th which for a new blog is pretty damn good! Lonely Conservative came from behind to win #1. Congrats!

Obama: Constitutional Squalor

The Man Who Knew Too Little

President Obama's stunning ignorance of constitutional law.

He appears to have missed the class on diplomacy as well. I guess he didn’t have the energy.

'Jewbags' For Obama

This should play well with adults in the room. BTW, it is no longer available on Facebook. Scrubbed.

DEMOCRATS’ ‘JEW CASH MONEY TEAM’

And Baby Kittens Will Be Forced To Warm Their Own Milk

As one friend put it, it was the most chilling presidential speech they had ever heard. It was if he was speaking in an alter reality from another world.

Obama Warns GOP Budget Would Make Weather Prediction Less Accurate

It seems that he has decided that it is his way or the highway and that includes you guys and gals in the black robes. Everybody is now on notice. Including you, Chicken Little. Officially.

$174,800 Fraudulent Donation To Obama Just The Tip Of The Iceberg

Here we go again: Obama website accepting contributions from phony donors?

 In fact, the end result of all this nonsense was an FEC discretionary review (i.e. audit) of the campaign. You would think, after that, that they’d do everything by the book this time. But when your fundraising’s going worse than expected, maybe your priorities change — assuming anti-fraud priorities were ever there to begin with.

Phonies donating to a phony has a certain je ne sais quoi, especially when a person’s identity is stolen to make a $174,800 fraudulent donation to a presidential candidate and nobody seems to care. At least nobody on that campaign. I do know what that means. Tip. Of. The. Iceberg. Titantic.

Racist AGW Deniers Must Be Treated For Aberrant Behavior II

Tribal environmental health expert gets treated by her university. I guess one could say she got her environment scrubbed. Gee, I wonder why?

Rewriting history: “treatment” of climate sceptics disappears from University of Oregon press statement

Yep, Ms Norgaard seems to have been pushed down a memory hole. With the publishing of this piece maybe she’ll be resurrected, that wacky Lord Monckton will be waiting:

He wrote to Ms Norgaard as follows

“My attention has been drawn to what is said to be a press statement by the University of Oregon saying that you have prepared a paper saying, inter alia, that what you describe as “cultural resistance” at “individual level” to the notion of spending large sums on attempting to prevent global warming is something that “must be recognized and treated”.

Yet I invite you to understand that those of us who are doubters have good scientific and economic reason for our doubts.

First, there is good evidence that the principal conclusions of all four IPCC assessment reports are erroneous, and that two of these conclusions may be fraudulent.

Secondly, the IPCC’s predictions first made a generation ago have proven to be considerable exaggerations. What you have described as a “massive threat” appears to be non-existent. What was predicted is not happening at anything like the predicted rate.

Thirdly, the IPCC’s very high climate sensitivity estimates depend upon the assumption that temperature feedbacks that cannot be either measured or distinguished from direct forcings will triple those forcings, whereas the remarkable homeostasis of temperatures over at least the last 64 million years suggests either that feedbacks are net-negative or that the feedback-amplification equation (taken from electronic circuitry) is inapplicable to the climate, in which event equilibrium warming at CO2 doubling will be 1 Celsius degree, which is harmless and beneficial, and 21st-century warming from this cause will be little more than half the equilibrium warming.

Fourthly, the peer-reviewed economic journals are near-unanimous in finding that the cost of attempting to prevent global warming will greatly exceed the cost of doing nothing now and instead adapting in a focused way to any climate-related damage that may occur as a result of future global warming. My own calculations indicate that the cost of action now is likely to exceed the cost of focused adaptation later by one or two orders of magnitude.

I am uneasy that you should have recommended what the University of Oregon’s press notice is said to describe as “treatment” for those with whom you disagree. In Europe, within living memory, there were two totalitarian regimes that subjected legitimate scientific dissenters to “treatment”. You will forgive me for saying that humanity should surely not sink to those cruel and fatal depths of government-mandated unreason ever again.

I hope you will be able either to assure me either that the report I have read is inaccurate or that you are withdrawing or at least amending the paper”

Monckton has not of course received a reply. Featherbrain Norgaard probably did not even understand most of it

More on Monckton in Schenectady. It looks like Norgaard is being treated.