Is this guy a piece of work or what?
Obama signs press freedom act, declines to take questions
The law requires the State Department to list countries that threaten press freedoms and permit violence against journalists. It "puts us clearly on the side of journalistic freedom," Obama said.
...
"You are free to ask them," Obama said. "I'm not doing a press conference today."
This is just another chapter in Obama's rulebook concerning the press, the people and the plutocracy of power pimps that are sandbagging the White House against the rising flood of anger of the voters.
Look up arrogance and there is a picture of Obama.
Showing posts with label Putz Extraordinaire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Putz Extraordinaire. Show all posts
Monday, May 17, 2010
Friday, April 03, 2009
Minnie Me North Korea Channels Mel Gibson's William Wallace
The difference between reality and a desired projected image meant to imply seriousness.
It's not easy being Minnie Me. The qualifier here is that he may be frozen next to Elvis and Walt Disney.
Young Soldier: William Wallace is seven feet tall!
William Wallace: Yes, I've heard. Kills men by the hundreds. And if HE were here, he'd consume the English with fireballs from his eyes, and bolts of lightning from his arse.
It's not easy being Minnie Me. The qualifier here is that he may be frozen next to Elvis and Walt Disney.
Why doesn't Obama just fire the head of North Korea, send in Lil' Timmy and set their world aright again just like here? They could call it 'compassionate catastrophe II.'
Monday, March 02, 2009
Limbaugh Suffers From Low Esteem?
via American Power
Janeane Garofalo, owner of "I Hate Mysef Productions", knows that she is a better person than Rush. As one comedienne to another, she told Countdown's Keith Olbermann that her being a better person is a "scientific fact."
Whoa, with science behind her, I feel so much better.
Garofalo also hates Gov. Palin. As the owner of 15 beautiful tattoos, Garofalo pretty much hates anybody that is not a leftists which gives her so much quality time to hate the majority of people in this country.
Recently, she had the time to join a hate huddle with Mr Positive, Bill Maher:
Nearby, actress and comedian Janeane Garofalo was sitting down at Mr. Maher’s lunch table, looking as though she’d stepped off the set of her 1994 movie Reality Bites—layered tank tops, dark wavy hair, kitten glasses, tattoos exposed.
“I’m an atheist. I used to say agnostic but then I realized that I only said that out of fear,” she told the Transom. “I just thought it wasn’t fair to say ‘just in case there is a God.’ If I’m wrong, I’d rather be wrong all the way rather than claim to be agnostic to save my own ass.” Ms. Garofalo said she grew up in a strict conservative household and was a member of the Catholic Youth Organization until she was in college.
“It’s difficult to bring faith into Washington because it’s not debatable,” she continued. “If it was the religion of Martin Luther King or Jimmy Carter, that would be nice. They were nice about it.”
I've a friend that has had a tremendous amount of self inflicted problems as her self loathing and lying become her two most prominent features. She wants to now become a psychological counselor.
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Bill Ayer's Obama: An Opossum From Chicago
Opossum: Solitary and nocturnal: usually slow moving; when frightened and unable to flee may fall into an involuntary shock-like state, "playing 'possum"
The Ayers Question
Very soon after she was picked to be McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin was attacked by Obama campaign spokesmen and a Democratic member of Congress for once being seen wearing a Pat Buchanan button. She had an answer and the campaign offered it. Yet now we are asked to believe that it’s somehow inappropriate to inquire why Barack Obama’s political career began in the home of an admitted and unrepentant domestic terrorist of the radical left? “Who is Barack Obama?” is not an irrelevant question given the job Obama is seeking, and it’s a question he has sought mightily to avoid answering. The veil of secrecy he has thrown over his past (journalists have been denied access to his state legislative office records, documents about state earmarks he distributed in Illinois, a list of his legal clients, his state bar application, billing records related to Tony Rezko, medical records, academic records — all of which are the sort of documents candidates routinely make public) forces the question all the more.
The Obama campaign’s response to the question appears to be to raise John McCain’s connection to the Keating Five scandal. It is by no means out of bounds to raise the issue. McCain received campaign funds from Keating, his wife’s company had been involved in investment ventures with him, and he once met with federal regulators about Keating’s bank — though the Senate Ethics Committee found that unlike three other senators involved in the scandal, “Senator McCain’s actions were not improper.” The committee said only that he had exercised bad judgment by being involved with Keating at all and not seeing what others were doing. In fact, Bob Bennett, who was the Democratic lawyer selected by the committee to investigate the Keating Five, says in his book that he recommended that McCain’s name be dropped from the investigation because there was no evidence against him but, for political reasons (the other Senators were all Democrats), McCain’s name was left on the list.
McCain’s response to that scandal should certainly be compared with Obama’s Ayers explanations. McCain has spoken and written about every detail of the Keating mess, has expressed open contrition for allowing himself to be drawn into it even tangentially, and devoted years of his career to combating corruption as a result. He even badly overreacted and pushed for vastly excessive regulation of campaign financing. He has said (in a book in which he details his and others’ actions in the matter) that merely the appearance of impropriety involved makes his involvement with Keating “the worst mistake of my life.”
Had Obama done and said something similar regarding the sort of radicalism Ayers represents, he would now have an answer to offer. Instead, he has worked with Ayers, supported his causes, and denied any significance to the links between them. That, too, makes this a legitimate question about a man who would be president.
Yeah, Obama and his enablers including his publicity team, the main stream media, are all playing 'possum' on this, shocked that it is of concern and unable to run from it, just hunker down, and ignore it.
Obama is friends with terrorists, racists and outright wackjobs. If elected, will Obama have a Jacksonian nightmare where all of his friends swarm the White House to fawn over their new leader and looking for favors? Probably.
Of course, Soros and his minions may sneak in the back door with promises of oodles of cash if only their way is the only way. Either that or they'll just pick up the phone and give Obama his marching orders.
The Ayers Question
Very soon after she was picked to be McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin was attacked by Obama campaign spokesmen and a Democratic member of Congress for once being seen wearing a Pat Buchanan button. She had an answer and the campaign offered it. Yet now we are asked to believe that it’s somehow inappropriate to inquire why Barack Obama’s political career began in the home of an admitted and unrepentant domestic terrorist of the radical left? “Who is Barack Obama?” is not an irrelevant question given the job Obama is seeking, and it’s a question he has sought mightily to avoid answering. The veil of secrecy he has thrown over his past (journalists have been denied access to his state legislative office records, documents about state earmarks he distributed in Illinois, a list of his legal clients, his state bar application, billing records related to Tony Rezko, medical records, academic records — all of which are the sort of documents candidates routinely make public) forces the question all the more.
The Obama campaign’s response to the question appears to be to raise John McCain’s connection to the Keating Five scandal. It is by no means out of bounds to raise the issue. McCain received campaign funds from Keating, his wife’s company had been involved in investment ventures with him, and he once met with federal regulators about Keating’s bank — though the Senate Ethics Committee found that unlike three other senators involved in the scandal, “Senator McCain’s actions were not improper.” The committee said only that he had exercised bad judgment by being involved with Keating at all and not seeing what others were doing. In fact, Bob Bennett, who was the Democratic lawyer selected by the committee to investigate the Keating Five, says in his book that he recommended that McCain’s name be dropped from the investigation because there was no evidence against him but, for political reasons (the other Senators were all Democrats), McCain’s name was left on the list.
McCain’s response to that scandal should certainly be compared with Obama’s Ayers explanations. McCain has spoken and written about every detail of the Keating mess, has expressed open contrition for allowing himself to be drawn into it even tangentially, and devoted years of his career to combating corruption as a result. He even badly overreacted and pushed for vastly excessive regulation of campaign financing. He has said (in a book in which he details his and others’ actions in the matter) that merely the appearance of impropriety involved makes his involvement with Keating “the worst mistake of my life.”
Had Obama done and said something similar regarding the sort of radicalism Ayers represents, he would now have an answer to offer. Instead, he has worked with Ayers, supported his causes, and denied any significance to the links between them. That, too, makes this a legitimate question about a man who would be president.
Yeah, Obama and his enablers including his publicity team, the main stream media, are all playing 'possum' on this, shocked that it is of concern and unable to run from it, just hunker down, and ignore it.
Obama is friends with terrorists, racists and outright wackjobs. If elected, will Obama have a Jacksonian nightmare where all of his friends swarm the White House to fawn over their new leader and looking for favors? Probably.
Of course, Soros and his minions may sneak in the back door with promises of oodles of cash if only their way is the only way. Either that or they'll just pick up the phone and give Obama his marching orders.
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Networks Anchor Drifting Obama Campaign In Unknown Waters
Obama, whose ever changing veneer that hides who he really is, has completed his presidential PR team for his Grand Tour of Europe and the Middle East. It is unclear what role the networks will fulfill. Questions concerning whether they will be tag team nannies for Obama or whether they will shape Obama's message for general consumption or whether they will wet nurse the candidate have gone unanswered.
3 Anchors to Follow Obama's Trek Abroad
The three network anchors will travel to Europe and the Middle East next week for Barack Obama's trip, adding their high-wattage spotlight to what is already shaping up as a major media extravaganza.
Lured by an offer of interviews with the Democratic presidential candidate, Brian Williams, Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric will make the overseas trek, meaning that the NBC, ABC and CBS evening newscasts will originate from stops along the route and undoubtedly give it big play.
John McCain has taken three foreign trips in the past four months, all unaccompanied by a single network anchor.
The Grand Tour is a time honored tradition for debutantes, privileged young men, newlyweds and those who need to obscure unseemly deeds here in America. The Grand Tour is also an essential educational tool, especially for the upwardly mobile nouveau Riche , to appear to be worldly and sophisticated. A necessary expense for those wishing to enter the salons of power in the New World.
Sometimes those on the Grand Tour bring knick-knacks back for the family to exhibit to those they wish to impress. Other times the Grand Tour unfortunately provides the opportunity for a public faux pax, helping to cement in foreign minds the image of the American rube. The most famous being a peanut farmer who meddled in the never ending Middle East peace negotiations who offered the Pax Fauxmana creating decades of death and suffering, but, for a short period, offered the false hope of a political solution.
3 Anchors to Follow Obama's Trek Abroad
The three network anchors will travel to Europe and the Middle East next week for Barack Obama's trip, adding their high-wattage spotlight to what is already shaping up as a major media extravaganza.
Lured by an offer of interviews with the Democratic presidential candidate, Brian Williams, Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric will make the overseas trek, meaning that the NBC, ABC and CBS evening newscasts will originate from stops along the route and undoubtedly give it big play.
John McCain has taken three foreign trips in the past four months, all unaccompanied by a single network anchor.
The Grand Tour is a time honored tradition for debutantes, privileged young men, newlyweds and those who need to obscure unseemly deeds here in America. The Grand Tour is also an essential educational tool, especially for the upwardly mobile nouveau Riche , to appear to be worldly and sophisticated. A necessary expense for those wishing to enter the salons of power in the New World.
Sometimes those on the Grand Tour bring knick-knacks back for the family to exhibit to those they wish to impress. Other times the Grand Tour unfortunately provides the opportunity for a public faux pax, helping to cement in foreign minds the image of the American rube. The most famous being a peanut farmer who meddled in the never ending Middle East peace negotiations who offered the Pax Fauxmana creating decades of death and suffering, but, for a short period, offered the false hope of a political solution.
Monday, February 18, 2008
Obama Drives A Lincoln
From Ben Keeler
Now Chafee has endorsed Obama - no real surprise, the fake, most leftist Republican endorses the most left wing Democrat in the Senate.
Now Chafee has endorsed Obama - no real surprise, the fake, most leftist Republican endorses the most left wing Democrat in the Senate.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Toledo's Finkbeiner Meltdown Continues
Right Wing Champ is all over this.
My favorite is the morons who think this is to defend us from Canada. Go read about this, maybe contact Miss Marcey Kaptur about having her duck taping Finkbeiner's mouth. While Finkbeiner gets progressively more stupid, Marcy is a Progressive.
Berkeley East; Toledo Mayor Finkbeiner Kicks The Marines Out
You know, Toodeledoo coulda been the prize possession of Michigan. Yes, I meant to say prize possession.
The various surveys resulted in a 50-year dispute over the Toledo Strip, which was only five miles wide at the Indiana border and eight miles wide at Lake Erie. Although it has been reported that no shots were fired, Ohio and Michigan militia units were sent to the Toledo Strip between 1835 and 1837. But luck was on Ohio's side. At the time, the Compromise of 1820 allowed the admission of one slave state for one free state. Michigan and Missouri were to be admitted as states, but only when Michigan surrendered the Toledo Strip to Ohio. The reason? Probably because a Presidential election was coming up. State of Ohio residents could vote, while Michigan Territory residents could not.
Ohio might not feel so lucky now.
My favorite is the morons who think this is to defend us from Canada. Go read about this, maybe contact Miss Marcey Kaptur about having her duck taping Finkbeiner's mouth. While Finkbeiner gets progressively more stupid, Marcy is a Progressive.
Berkeley East; Toledo Mayor Finkbeiner Kicks The Marines Out
You know, Toodeledoo coulda been the prize possession of Michigan. Yes, I meant to say prize possession.
The various surveys resulted in a 50-year dispute over the Toledo Strip, which was only five miles wide at the Indiana border and eight miles wide at Lake Erie. Although it has been reported that no shots were fired, Ohio and Michigan militia units were sent to the Toledo Strip between 1835 and 1837. But luck was on Ohio's side. At the time, the Compromise of 1820 allowed the admission of one slave state for one free state. Michigan and Missouri were to be admitted as states, but only when Michigan surrendered the Toledo Strip to Ohio. The reason? Probably because a Presidential election was coming up. State of Ohio residents could vote, while Michigan Territory residents could not.
Ohio might not feel so lucky now.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Archbishop Rowan (& Martin) Williams Kills Kiddy Kristmas
Williams, continuing his vaudeville act, shows why he is the MC for the fastest dwindling religious group this side of the Shakers.
Archbishop says nativity 'a legend'
The Archbishop of Canterbury said yesterday that the Christmas story of the Three Wise Men was nothing but a 'legend'.
Dr Rowan Williams has claimed there was little evidence that the Magi even existed and there was certainly nothing to prove there were three of them or that they were kings.
Dr Williams argued that the traditional Christmas story was nothing but a 'legend'
He said the only reference to the wise men from the East was in Matthew's gospel and the details were very vague. Dr Williams said: "Matthew's gospel says they are astrologers, wise men, priests from somewhere outside the Roman Empire, that's all we're really told. It works quite well as legend."
The Archbishop went on to dispel other details of the Christmas story, adding that there were probably no asses or oxen in the stable.
He argued that Christmas cards which showed the Virgin Mary cradling the baby Jesus, flanked by shepherds and wise men, were misleading. As for the scenes that depicted snow falling in Bethlehem, the Archbishop said the chance of this was "very unlikely".
So, Mr. Williams you earn the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate award this week for insight into how to win friends and influence people. Soon you'll have your wish to sit in empty episcopal churches everywhere hissing into the dark, "It's mine, all mine. Mine!"
Archbishop says nativity 'a legend'
The Archbishop of Canterbury said yesterday that the Christmas story of the Three Wise Men was nothing but a 'legend'.
Dr Rowan Williams has claimed there was little evidence that the Magi even existed and there was certainly nothing to prove there were three of them or that they were kings.
Dr Williams argued that the traditional Christmas story was nothing but a 'legend'
He said the only reference to the wise men from the East was in Matthew's gospel and the details were very vague. Dr Williams said: "Matthew's gospel says they are astrologers, wise men, priests from somewhere outside the Roman Empire, that's all we're really told. It works quite well as legend."
The Archbishop went on to dispel other details of the Christmas story, adding that there were probably no asses or oxen in the stable.
He argued that Christmas cards which showed the Virgin Mary cradling the baby Jesus, flanked by shepherds and wise men, were misleading. As for the scenes that depicted snow falling in Bethlehem, the Archbishop said the chance of this was "very unlikely".
So, Mr. Williams you earn the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate award this week for insight into how to win friends and influence people. Soon you'll have your wish to sit in empty episcopal churches everywhere hissing into the dark, "It's mine, all mine. Mine!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)