ACORN - a community organizer group- is a socialist organization that has been fleecing the American public for years, cheating in the political arena, costing tax payers billions of dollars and is a group that works everyday to undermine our political system helping the Democratic Party. They are working for Barrack Obama because Barrack Obama used to work for them.
Their immediate goal is to steal elections all across the nation.
They steal elections through voter fraud, voter intimidation and raise money by shaking down business. Just like the mafia.
Their long term goal is the redistribution of wealth in America. Just like communists.
Obama helped ACORN in its lawsuit to impose President Bill Clinton’s 1993 National Voter Registration Act, nicknamed “Motor Voter,” according to Chicago ACORN leader Toni Foulkes. "Motor Voter", arguably a total fraud, has been one-upped in many swing states with the new instant registration/instant vote scheme designed to pump up votes for Obama by dragging the homeless, bums, drunks and students in to vote for Obama immediately because they are unreliable and won't show up on election day. A typical ACORN tactic. A typical fraud.
It is not racist. It is ballot integrity.
Let's see, pointing out voter fraud is racist. Pointing out financial fraud by Democrats is racist. Pointing out where one disagrees with Obama is racist. Not wanting to pay for fraudulent mortgages is racist. But treating blacks as if they are incapable of voting, getting a mortgage and deciding who to vote for is not racist, it is the liberal love of sensitivity for those less capable than them. Ahem, that is racist.
Of the 19 foreign terrorists who struck America on 9/11, 6 were registered to vote.
ACORN was caught in their registration fraud through a verification process by the board of elections and because each registration form was identified by serial numbers the fraudulent forms were traced back to ACORN. Watch for ACORN to cite privacy and ballot integrity to have any registration form identification removed to prevent their fake registrations from being traced back to them. Hell, they've already made it illegal to ask for voter identification because it might suppress the vote of minorities and illegal voters. Of course, it also suppresses the graveyard vote which is a major concern for Obama and other Chicago politicians.
Obama has called us racists. Barney Frank has called us racists. Maybe the Democrats can ask Sen. Bob Byrd, D-WV, to take off his KKK hood long enough to call us racist.
Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Debate: Obama Says ................. NADA, But Says It well !!
Obam speaks in empty tongues. He answers nothing, but offers pleasant tones of emptiness and wonderful solutions that will "work for you" except he didn't say a damned thing.
Bill Ayer's Obama: An Opossum From Chicago
Opossum: Solitary and nocturnal: usually slow moving; when frightened and unable to flee may fall into an involuntary shock-like state, "playing 'possum"
The Ayers Question
Very soon after she was picked to be McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin was attacked by Obama campaign spokesmen and a Democratic member of Congress for once being seen wearing a Pat Buchanan button. She had an answer and the campaign offered it. Yet now we are asked to believe that it’s somehow inappropriate to inquire why Barack Obama’s political career began in the home of an admitted and unrepentant domestic terrorist of the radical left? “Who is Barack Obama?” is not an irrelevant question given the job Obama is seeking, and it’s a question he has sought mightily to avoid answering. The veil of secrecy he has thrown over his past (journalists have been denied access to his state legislative office records, documents about state earmarks he distributed in Illinois, a list of his legal clients, his state bar application, billing records related to Tony Rezko, medical records, academic records — all of which are the sort of documents candidates routinely make public) forces the question all the more.
The Obama campaign’s response to the question appears to be to raise John McCain’s connection to the Keating Five scandal. It is by no means out of bounds to raise the issue. McCain received campaign funds from Keating, his wife’s company had been involved in investment ventures with him, and he once met with federal regulators about Keating’s bank — though the Senate Ethics Committee found that unlike three other senators involved in the scandal, “Senator McCain’s actions were not improper.” The committee said only that he had exercised bad judgment by being involved with Keating at all and not seeing what others were doing. In fact, Bob Bennett, who was the Democratic lawyer selected by the committee to investigate the Keating Five, says in his book that he recommended that McCain’s name be dropped from the investigation because there was no evidence against him but, for political reasons (the other Senators were all Democrats), McCain’s name was left on the list.
McCain’s response to that scandal should certainly be compared with Obama’s Ayers explanations. McCain has spoken and written about every detail of the Keating mess, has expressed open contrition for allowing himself to be drawn into it even tangentially, and devoted years of his career to combating corruption as a result. He even badly overreacted and pushed for vastly excessive regulation of campaign financing. He has said (in a book in which he details his and others’ actions in the matter) that merely the appearance of impropriety involved makes his involvement with Keating “the worst mistake of my life.”
Had Obama done and said something similar regarding the sort of radicalism Ayers represents, he would now have an answer to offer. Instead, he has worked with Ayers, supported his causes, and denied any significance to the links between them. That, too, makes this a legitimate question about a man who would be president.
Yeah, Obama and his enablers including his publicity team, the main stream media, are all playing 'possum' on this, shocked that it is of concern and unable to run from it, just hunker down, and ignore it.
Obama is friends with terrorists, racists and outright wackjobs. If elected, will Obama have a Jacksonian nightmare where all of his friends swarm the White House to fawn over their new leader and looking for favors? Probably.
Of course, Soros and his minions may sneak in the back door with promises of oodles of cash if only their way is the only way. Either that or they'll just pick up the phone and give Obama his marching orders.
The Ayers Question
Very soon after she was picked to be McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin was attacked by Obama campaign spokesmen and a Democratic member of Congress for once being seen wearing a Pat Buchanan button. She had an answer and the campaign offered it. Yet now we are asked to believe that it’s somehow inappropriate to inquire why Barack Obama’s political career began in the home of an admitted and unrepentant domestic terrorist of the radical left? “Who is Barack Obama?” is not an irrelevant question given the job Obama is seeking, and it’s a question he has sought mightily to avoid answering. The veil of secrecy he has thrown over his past (journalists have been denied access to his state legislative office records, documents about state earmarks he distributed in Illinois, a list of his legal clients, his state bar application, billing records related to Tony Rezko, medical records, academic records — all of which are the sort of documents candidates routinely make public) forces the question all the more.
The Obama campaign’s response to the question appears to be to raise John McCain’s connection to the Keating Five scandal. It is by no means out of bounds to raise the issue. McCain received campaign funds from Keating, his wife’s company had been involved in investment ventures with him, and he once met with federal regulators about Keating’s bank — though the Senate Ethics Committee found that unlike three other senators involved in the scandal, “Senator McCain’s actions were not improper.” The committee said only that he had exercised bad judgment by being involved with Keating at all and not seeing what others were doing. In fact, Bob Bennett, who was the Democratic lawyer selected by the committee to investigate the Keating Five, says in his book that he recommended that McCain’s name be dropped from the investigation because there was no evidence against him but, for political reasons (the other Senators were all Democrats), McCain’s name was left on the list.
McCain’s response to that scandal should certainly be compared with Obama’s Ayers explanations. McCain has spoken and written about every detail of the Keating mess, has expressed open contrition for allowing himself to be drawn into it even tangentially, and devoted years of his career to combating corruption as a result. He even badly overreacted and pushed for vastly excessive regulation of campaign financing. He has said (in a book in which he details his and others’ actions in the matter) that merely the appearance of impropriety involved makes his involvement with Keating “the worst mistake of my life.”
Had Obama done and said something similar regarding the sort of radicalism Ayers represents, he would now have an answer to offer. Instead, he has worked with Ayers, supported his causes, and denied any significance to the links between them. That, too, makes this a legitimate question about a man who would be president.
Yeah, Obama and his enablers including his publicity team, the main stream media, are all playing 'possum' on this, shocked that it is of concern and unable to run from it, just hunker down, and ignore it.
Obama is friends with terrorists, racists and outright wackjobs. If elected, will Obama have a Jacksonian nightmare where all of his friends swarm the White House to fawn over their new leader and looking for favors? Probably.
Of course, Soros and his minions may sneak in the back door with promises of oodles of cash if only their way is the only way. Either that or they'll just pick up the phone and give Obama his marching orders.
Monday, October 06, 2008
Obama's Bernardine Dohrn: A Pig From Hell
I think it's pretty common knowledge that Obama, after 21 year of knowing Ayers and Dohrn, is fibbing big time about what he knows about them as subhuman beings, but I read a piece that gives more insight to what a pig from Hell Dohrn is.
Ayers-Dohrn-Obama Tie Shouldn’t Be Dismissed
Since terrorism, bombing and murder fade after a few years, a few tidbits to show how time has made her acceptable to Obama and Democrats:
For those of you unfamiliar with Dohrn and her special love of violence in the name of radicalism, one need look no further than her December 1969 rant celebrating the brutal Tate-LaBianca murders with the exhortation, “Dig it! First they killed those pigs and then they put a fork in their bellies. Wild!”
and:
A Chicago district attorney named Richard Elrod was seriously injured in the Weatherman riot that erupted during the Chicago “Days of Rage” in October 1969, and he was paralyzed for life as a result. Dohrn later led a celebration of Elrod’s paralysis by leading her comrades in a parody of a Bob Dylan song — “Lay, Elrod, Lay.”
and:
That the Weathermen tried to murder a judge and his family with fire bombs was somehow not mentioned at all, nor were later Weathermen-related bombings that occurred through Barack Obama’s continuing political radicalization during the early 1980s.
And just where was Barack Obama during the early 1980s?
Mocking the dead and the disabled seems to be so common place to liberals that what Dohrn is is not reprehensible.
Of course, if McCain had been her friend and pal....
Ayers-Dohrn-Obama Tie Shouldn’t Be Dismissed
Since terrorism, bombing and murder fade after a few years, a few tidbits to show how time has made her acceptable to Obama and Democrats:
For those of you unfamiliar with Dohrn and her special love of violence in the name of radicalism, one need look no further than her December 1969 rant celebrating the brutal Tate-LaBianca murders with the exhortation, “Dig it! First they killed those pigs and then they put a fork in their bellies. Wild!”
and:
A Chicago district attorney named Richard Elrod was seriously injured in the Weatherman riot that erupted during the Chicago “Days of Rage” in October 1969, and he was paralyzed for life as a result. Dohrn later led a celebration of Elrod’s paralysis by leading her comrades in a parody of a Bob Dylan song — “Lay, Elrod, Lay.”
and:
That the Weathermen tried to murder a judge and his family with fire bombs was somehow not mentioned at all, nor were later Weathermen-related bombings that occurred through Barack Obama’s continuing political radicalization during the early 1980s.
And just where was Barack Obama during the early 1980s?
Mocking the dead and the disabled seems to be so common place to liberals that what Dohrn is is not reprehensible.
Of course, if McCain had been her friend and pal....
Intellectual Liberal Effeteness That Makes The Marquis de Sade An Acceptable Dinner Partner
Or a David Duke.
How about discussing women's rights over some goose foie gras with President Puny, Mamadou Abadinijad?
What is the Significance of Obama's Ties to Ayers (and Wright?):
In short, Obama's ties to Ayers and Wright suggest to me NOT that Obama agrees with their views, but that he is the product of a particular intellectual culture that finds the likes of Wright and Ayers to be no more objectionable, and likely less so, than the likes of Tom Coburn, or, perhaps, a Rush Limbaugh. Not only that, but he has been in his particular intellectual bubble so long that he was unable to recognize just how offensive the views of a Wright are to mainstream America, or how his ties to Ayers would play with the public, especially post-9/11.
After dinner there could be apertifs in the private salon with Stalin to discuss the educational needs of the children of the Ukraine. Music will be performed by the Children's Stringed Up Quartet.
How about discussing women's rights over some goose foie gras with President Puny, Mamadou Abadinijad?
What is the Significance of Obama's Ties to Ayers (and Wright?):
In short, Obama's ties to Ayers and Wright suggest to me NOT that Obama agrees with their views, but that he is the product of a particular intellectual culture that finds the likes of Wright and Ayers to be no more objectionable, and likely less so, than the likes of Tom Coburn, or, perhaps, a Rush Limbaugh. Not only that, but he has been in his particular intellectual bubble so long that he was unable to recognize just how offensive the views of a Wright are to mainstream America, or how his ties to Ayers would play with the public, especially post-9/11.
After dinner there could be apertifs in the private salon with Stalin to discuss the educational needs of the children of the Ukraine. Music will be performed by the Children's Stringed Up Quartet.
Obama Youth
TEENS PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO OBAMA...
Obama Youth. Maybe they're practising to be part of the palace guard with Louis Farrakhan's security unit.
Obama Youth. Maybe they're practising to be part of the palace guard with Louis Farrakhan's security unit.
Obama/McCain - Monday Morning Thought
Al-Qaida: US economic crisis equals Muslim victory...
OBAMA CALLS MCCAIN 'ERRATIC IN CRISIS'...
By the way, al Qaeda endorses Obama.
OBAMA CALLS MCCAIN 'ERRATIC IN CRISIS'...
By the way, al Qaeda endorses Obama.
Sunday, October 05, 2008
Douglass K. Daniel: Another Journalistic Embarrassment For Obama
Analysis: Palin's words carry racial tinge
Daniels should get out more. Now that CBGB's is closed, Daniels parents have no place to take him on Wednesday nights.
Daniels should get out more. Now that CBGB's is closed, Daniels parents have no place to take him on Wednesday nights.
Obama Admits To Being Pal With Murderer Ayers
Obama worked with him and spent time with him, but just like with Jeremiah Wright, Obama never heard that Ayers was a murdering thug that hated America and later said that he should have done more to destroy America.
AP's Douglass K. Daniel, Racist
Daniel suggests that Palin is a liar for saying that Obama and Ayers are pals. I guess wasting $160 million together is just done between strangers.
Palin's words carry racial tinge
Hey, he didn't call Jenny Backus, a Democratic strategist, a sexist for calling Palin a "fluffy bunny" who is incapable of being taken seriously. Backus thinks Palin is just another dumb broad.
Oh, I'm sorry, blacks can't be racist and women can't be sexist. Right?
If Daniel's is analysis, it is some sorry analysis at best, "if not outright false." And Daniel's a racist for crying race everytime someone tells the truth about or disagrees with Obama. Obama is black, ok? Get over it liberals. Nobody cares.
What I care about is his ultra liberal politics and friends. Obama would be bad for America.
If you think that makes me a racist, go screw yourselves.
This Ain't Hell has more. Go read a well done piece:
Where did Douglass Daniel, the author, get the “not like us” quote? It wasn’t from Palin…it was from Obama himself who’s fond of reminding his zombies that Republicans are going to continually remind voters that Obama is not like us and has a funny name.So Daniel and the AP have taken to using Obama quotes and inserting them in articles about his Republican opponents in quotations as if the Republicans and not Obama said it.
This is just great, Daniel uses Obama's words, out of context, and falsely uses the to paint Palin as a racist. Daniel isn't just a racist, he is a liar.
Palin's words carry racial tinge
Hey, he didn't call Jenny Backus, a Democratic strategist, a sexist for calling Palin a "fluffy bunny" who is incapable of being taken seriously. Backus thinks Palin is just another dumb broad.
Oh, I'm sorry, blacks can't be racist and women can't be sexist. Right?
If Daniel's is analysis, it is some sorry analysis at best, "if not outright false." And Daniel's a racist for crying race everytime someone tells the truth about or disagrees with Obama. Obama is black, ok? Get over it liberals. Nobody cares.
What I care about is his ultra liberal politics and friends. Obama would be bad for America.
If you think that makes me a racist, go screw yourselves.
This Ain't Hell has more. Go read a well done piece:
Where did Douglass Daniel, the author, get the “not like us” quote? It wasn’t from Palin…it was from Obama himself who’s fond of reminding his zombies that Republicans are going to continually remind voters that Obama is not like us and has a funny name.So Daniel and the AP have taken to using Obama quotes and inserting them in articles about his Republican opponents in quotations as if the Republicans and not Obama said it.
This is just great, Daniel uses Obama's words, out of context, and falsely uses the to paint Palin as a racist. Daniel isn't just a racist, he is a liar.
IF Fascism 'Joins' Republicans, Democrats Should Rejoice!
IF any Republicans start using fascist thought, and especially fascist programs, Democrats will be able to rightfully rejoice that Republicans have seen their light and are on the path of truth, equality and justice, Democrat style.
In his book 'Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning' , Jonah Goldberg rightfully points out that socialism's twin is fascism and the path Democrats and liberals in American have embarked is 'soft fascism.' That socialism is the father of liberalism is undeniable, but it appears that the most offensive quality of Hitler and Mussolini is that they used military tactics as a method to streamline and manage those who disagreed with them. Here in America, liberal fascists just marginalize those that disagree as 'Red Staters' who are dumb hicks who are to be ridiculed and dismissed from the 'real' political process.
Kill'em cold or cold shoulder murder, it doesn't matter, liberal fascism wins, but only if liberal fascists continue the mantra that Republicans are the REAL fascists, not them.
In his book 'Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning' , Jonah Goldberg rightfully points out that socialism's twin is fascism and the path Democrats and liberals in American have embarked is 'soft fascism.' That socialism is the father of liberalism is undeniable, but it appears that the most offensive quality of Hitler and Mussolini is that they used military tactics as a method to streamline and manage those who disagreed with them. Here in America, liberal fascists just marginalize those that disagree as 'Red Staters' who are dumb hicks who are to be ridiculed and dismissed from the 'real' political process.
Kill'em cold or cold shoulder murder, it doesn't matter, liberal fascism wins, but only if liberal fascists continue the mantra that Republicans are the REAL fascists, not them.
Saturday, October 04, 2008
BTW, Is A Free Public Education Free?
I have spent over a thousand dollars so far this year for school costs for my niece who now lives with us.
Why are we paying for subjects and 'costs' that cause us to pay for programs that used to be part of the basic curriculum?
History used to be history. Now it is a class on what is wrong with our history. Sports used to be part of going to school, now it is an expense.
That sucks. And it is now expensive.
Why are we paying for subjects and 'costs' that cause us to pay for programs that used to be part of the basic curriculum?
History used to be history. Now it is a class on what is wrong with our history. Sports used to be part of going to school, now it is an expense.
That sucks. And it is now expensive.
Spineless Biden Throws His Son Under The Bus To Please Obama For Defeat In Iraq
Joe Biden used to support the troops. Now Joe Biden should be supporting his son.
He isn't. He is supporting Barrack Obama who does not support our troops. Snatching victory from the jaws of victory is thirsty and dirty work. To participate, one must desire victory in a political race more, and be willing to disgrace the blood of those who have died completing their mission, than a victory for one's country.
That is Obama. Joe Biden, for all his back stabbing faults, supported our troops. For political gain, Biden is willing to knife our countrymen in the back. He is willing to stab his own son in the back.
Joe Biden Supported Funding the Troops Before He --joined Obama and-- Didn't Support the Troops
Joe Biden: "And, look, Tim, if you tell me I've got to take away this protection for these kids in order to win the election, some things aren't worth it. Some things are worth losing over. That would be worth losing over. Hundreds of lives are being saved and will be saved by us sending these vehicles over which we are funding with this supplemental legislation. And I want to ask any of my other colleagues, would they, in fact, vote to cut off the money for those troops to protect them? That's the right question. This isn't cutting off the war. This is cutting off support that will save the lives of thousands of American troops."
Biden is a known liar by his colleagues in Congress. He is known for not keeping his word. He is known for his willingness to renege on his word for political expediency.
He is not worthy of the term of candidate, let alone Vice President.
He isn't. He is supporting Barrack Obama who does not support our troops. Snatching victory from the jaws of victory is thirsty and dirty work. To participate, one must desire victory in a political race more, and be willing to disgrace the blood of those who have died completing their mission, than a victory for one's country.
That is Obama. Joe Biden, for all his back stabbing faults, supported our troops. For political gain, Biden is willing to knife our countrymen in the back. He is willing to stab his own son in the back.
Joe Biden Supported Funding the Troops Before He --joined Obama and-- Didn't Support the Troops
Joe Biden: "And, look, Tim, if you tell me I've got to take away this protection for these kids in order to win the election, some things aren't worth it. Some things are worth losing over. That would be worth losing over. Hundreds of lives are being saved and will be saved by us sending these vehicles over which we are funding with this supplemental legislation. And I want to ask any of my other colleagues, would they, in fact, vote to cut off the money for those troops to protect them? That's the right question. This isn't cutting off the war. This is cutting off support that will save the lives of thousands of American troops."
Biden is a known liar by his colleagues in Congress. He is known for not keeping his word. He is known for his willingness to renege on his word for political expediency.
He is not worthy of the term of candidate, let alone Vice President.
PO'd About The Wall Street Mess?
Follow it back to Fannie & Freddie and follow that back to the Democrats in Congress and look at Schumer, Dodd and others, but especially look at Barney Frank. Frank is still the classroom smartass who is bright, but totally unreliable to make correct decisions and he doesn't get that this isn't a game of, 'ha ha, look at what I did!'
Frank has hurt millions of people and reliably, he will deny it and will smirk and dare anybody to go up against him.
Lawmaker Accused of Fannie Mae Conflict of Interest
Critics say such programs led to the mortgage meltdown that prompted last month’s government takeover of Fannie Mae and its financial cousin, Freddie Mac. The giant firms are blamed for spreading bad mortgages throughout the private financial sector.
Although Frank now blames Republicans for the failure of Fannie and Freddie, he spent years blocking GOP lawmakers from imposing tougher regulations on the mortgage giants. In 1991, the year Moses was hired by Fannie, the Boston Globe reported that Frank pushed the agency to loosen regulations on mortgages for two- and three-family homes, even though they were defaulting at twice and five times the rate of single homes, respectively.
Three years later, President Clinton’s Department of Housing and Urban Development tried to impose a new regulation on Fannie, but was thwarted by Frank. Clinton now blames such Democrats for planting the seeds of today’s economic crisis.
"I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was president, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Clinton said recently.
Personally, I think that the Democrats, both actively involved and those who sat back and just reaped the financial rewards, should stand next to the corporate executives and answer to justice. If found guilty, they should have to spend every penny they have to pay us back.
Frank has hurt millions of people and reliably, he will deny it and will smirk and dare anybody to go up against him.
Lawmaker Accused of Fannie Mae Conflict of Interest
Critics say such programs led to the mortgage meltdown that prompted last month’s government takeover of Fannie Mae and its financial cousin, Freddie Mac. The giant firms are blamed for spreading bad mortgages throughout the private financial sector.
Although Frank now blames Republicans for the failure of Fannie and Freddie, he spent years blocking GOP lawmakers from imposing tougher regulations on the mortgage giants. In 1991, the year Moses was hired by Fannie, the Boston Globe reported that Frank pushed the agency to loosen regulations on mortgages for two- and three-family homes, even though they were defaulting at twice and five times the rate of single homes, respectively.
Three years later, President Clinton’s Department of Housing and Urban Development tried to impose a new regulation on Fannie, but was thwarted by Frank. Clinton now blames such Democrats for planting the seeds of today’s economic crisis.
"I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was president, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Clinton said recently.
Personally, I think that the Democrats, both actively involved and those who sat back and just reaped the financial rewards, should stand next to the corporate executives and answer to justice. If found guilty, they should have to spend every penny they have to pay us back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)