Showing posts with label SCOTUS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SCOTUS. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2012

How Much Will ObamaScare Cost?

Nobody knows. Calculators don't calculate that high. If you're poor, you will suffer. If you are middle class, you will suffer more. If you are rich, in the end, you will be poor. Nice policy Obama. Bad decision Roberts. Roberts, you stunned me and I am so disappointed in you. You changed our nation to the bad.

Obama policies are stupid and bad for us. Roberts, you enabled him. Marshall you ain't. Live with the shame. Black robe and all.

I feel that we may have lost our constitution and our country today. A loss of the brightest experiment of freedom in the history of the world.

That's a loss. For the world.

Of course that is what liberals want.

Will this make me acquiesce? No. The opposite. Time to fight.

Hard.

Monday, June 11, 2012

Five Scariest Words For The United States Of America

Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder.


It's not just the stupid, it's the stupid combined with their agenda.  

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

SCOTUS: ObamaCare Win Could Mean Obama Loss

Many friends are saying if ObamaCare wins with the Supremes we could see an Obama loss in November. Inversely, a supreme loss could signal a sympathetic win for the One in November.

The results? If Obama wins we're stuck with him and his ilk for only four more years. If the anti-patient, anti-doctor and anti-American ObamaCare wins we will get a Romney for president, but we'll be stuck with ObamaCare for ever.

For America we can only hope ObamaCare and Obama go the way of all socialist governments.

Ashcan.

Thursday, August 05, 2010

Elena Kagan 112th Member Of The SCOTUS - Oh Crap, Thanks RINOs

Finding possibly the worst candidate for the Supreme Court of the US is something a community organizer would be good at, but getting her put in place takes geniuses like the group of RINOs who didn't even fight for our country.

Elena Kagan, the 112th U.S. Supreme Court Justice

The five Republicans who supported Kagan were Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Richard Lugar of Indiana and Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.

So now we have a community organizer that can't organize as president and a supreme court judge that knows nothing of the bench sitting on the highest court in the land. At least Obama will be gone soon, but Kagan will be there long enough to subject the US to the World Court thus demoting her and her fellow Supremes to the next highest court in the land.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

SURPRISE, SURPRISE: Clintons Clam Up To Cover Their Butts

RUSH, RUSH: Clinton Library Says it May Not Produce Kagan Docs in Time for Hearing...

So, how many documents have the Clintons found a little too late...

Monday, May 10, 2010

The Anti-Religious Steal Senior's Prayer

I can imagine how my mother would've reacted. Upon being told she couldn't pray she would have lifted all 5' 2" inches to her feet and out loud led the group in prayer. And yes, she would have asked God to forgive the heathens who steal love and faith from the group, but she would have mostly asked God to help thugs who bully those with little time left to them.

Ga. Seniors Told They Can't Pray Before Meals
Tim Rutherford, Senior Citizens Inc. vice president, said some of his staff recently visited the center and noticed people praying shortly before lunch was served. Rutherford said his company provides meals like baked chicken, steak tips and rice and salads at a cost of about $6 a plate. Seniors taking the meals pay 55 cents and federal money foots the rest of the bill, Rutherford said.

"We can't scoff at their rules," he said of federal authorities. "It's a part of the operational guidelines."
 
Our three branches of government should be proud.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

The 9th: Christian Groups Can't Be Christian

In a race to the bottom of the bile, the 9th circuit court has decided a christian group on the campus of UC Hastings College of Law is acting illegally by demanding that voting members of the group act Christian.

For the fun loving 9th this ruling appears at least consistent. Actually, consistently and willfully stupid. Okay, maybe not, but at least consistently political.

Hello SCOTUS overturn.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Clarence Thomas: 40 Years Of Liberal Nightmare

HISTORY? Clarence Thomas: I'll serve on Court for 40 years...

When justices follow the constitution, especially when they don't find the constitution to be a fluid document, it just drives them nuts.

Thursday, May 07, 2009

No Woman For Supreme Court

No woman, no black, no white, no latino, no oriental, no martian.

Practical politico, and woman, sought for court

The nominee should be a person that is precisely 5'5" and a half, black hair, green eyes, with a slight lisp, wears no natural fiber clothing, owns a cur and a cat, drives a 1972 Pinto, has never riden a mule in the Grand Canyon, once did volunteer work at the Mustang Ranch, has had at least one known acquaintence without a STD and is at least 3 years delinquent on all of their taxes to prove once and for all that liberals never use quotas, just friends.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Jefferson's 'Wall of Separation" Myth & the SCOTUS Lie

In 1802 President Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Danbury Baptists in response to their request for assistance. In his letter Jefferson wrote of a wall of separation. Jefferson relied on the Constitution and in this particular case relied on the First and Tenth Amendments, i.e., the Tenth Amendment supported powers reserved for the states prohibiting the federal government from religious establishment of religion, a government church like the Church of England. He stated this clearly in 1805:

In matters of religion, I have considered that its free exercise is placed by the constitution independent of the powers of the general [i.e., federal] government. I have therefore undertaken, on no occasion, to prescribe the religious exercises suited to it; but have left them, as the constitution found them, under the direction and discipline of State or Church authorities acknowledged by the several religious societies.

In 1947, Justice Hugo L. Black authored the opinion in Everson v. Board of Education using Jefferson's letter further stating that the wall of separation must be "high and impregnable." SCOTUS was wrong then to stretch Jefferson's metaphor while ignoring his actions and other writings because the decision was couched in terms to fit their desire.

I write about this because a number of pastors are challenging the government based on the First and Tenth Amendments as seen in the headline below.

Pastors Challenge Law, Endorse Candidates From Pulpit

What caught my eye in the article though, was another example of the media's ever growing use of "facts" to reinforce them subtly in the reader's mind.

The separation of church and state may be one of our democracy's most vaunted values, but its enforcement falls to one of our government's most derided institutions — the IRS.

Vaunted? Sorry, I have to call a BS here. I'll let go the fact that the moron who wrote this story doesn't know the difference between a republic and a democracy, but vaunted value of our country? Double BS. Jefferson never meant that there should be a complete separation and Justice Black knew this. Black and the court needed this interpretation so they could overturn or roll back state and local policies and programs with which they disagreed with.

I wonder if the SCOTUS will use the released correspondence of FDR to roll back the welfare state he built in the U.S.?

Monday, June 16, 2008

Truth, Justice & The American Way

Black is white. Left is right and wrong is right. No truth, no justice and no American way.

Top court eases rules for foreigners to try to stay in US

Will the bottom court ease rules for me when I want what is illegal? Uh-uh, I'm a poor dumb sap WASP who pays my bills on time. A five time loser.

Anyone know if Justice Kennedy is from Hyannis?