Friday, November 10, 2006

Stained election

Well, it has started.

First, all the likely libs said they weren’t going to impeach President Bush. Of course it implied that they really wanted bi-partisan cooperation and that they could successfully impeach President Bush. A win-win for the libs, in their mind.

Second, the libs announce that they are going to hold “hearings” about what led us into war and how that war has been handled. Conyers, this time, won’t have to hear the snickers such as when he held a “hearing” in the basement, demanded to be addressed as “chairman” by a nearly empty room.

Third, in their mind, the libs will just have to bow to public sentiment during these “hearings” and try to impeach President Bush. They will announce that the “clamor” from the 3 multiple personality members of DU and the 4 strong membership of the imagined reality-based community at kos as well as their staff forced their reluctant hand.

The media conglomerate Abcbsnbcnn and the Bostonwashingtonla Globepostimes in conjunction with AljazeeraGuardian will positively weep as each “revelation” is leaked out dribble by dribble to the incredulous reporter. Each “revelation” will appropriately show that it was/is worse than anyone thought/knew.

It was really all just revenge by one Bush for another Bush.

They’ll be half right. It is all about revenge and it includes a Bush.

There is no bi-partisan hopes coming from the Democrats and there is only one hope which is revenge against Bush for being Bush and against Republicans who dared to call Clinton’s lying under oath an impeachable offense.

Boiled down this is really about two failed presidential elections and a stained blue dress.

Even I didn’t expect less from the Democrats, but I’ve received it. How incredibly sad for Harry Pelosi, Charlie Conyers and their liberal peers.