Kloppenburg Ready To Go Al Franken And Steal The Election

via Legal Insurrection which is always a good read.

Kloppenburg Laying Foundation To Delegitimize Inevitable Prosser Win

The mistake of the County Clerk in not reporting any votes from Brookfield to the AP on election night, which was discovered the next day, has led to false charges that the votes were "found."  In fact, the votes were reported publicly by Brookfield on election night, and a review by the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (GAB) found no wrongdoing.

Nonetheless, Kloppenburg's tactic is to try to throw out much if not all of Brookfield, based on supposed improper sealing of vote bags.

Al Franken used the same tactic to steal his election which is to make any questionable vote for him count while throwing out any questionable vote for his opponent and Kloppenburg's "legal" team is using the same tactics. Just as Al is a faux senator Kloppenburg was a faux candidate because this election wasn't about her or even Gov Walker, it was about union power and their ability to fix an election. If they don't win it will be remembered as the high water mark ergo the beginning of their long retreat to oblivion.

While in DC I heard some doofus compare the Prosser/Kloppenburg election to Bush's elections, saying it is time for Democrats to steal an election successfully. Even after the circumstances were laid out including the legal battles that clearly showed Bush to be the victor and being reminded that Democrats have routinely "won" questionable elections he did what they normally do, he stomped off calling everyone Nazis. Typical.

Is Wisconsin's Kloppenburg Saying Minnesota's Dead Union Votes For Al Franken Went To Prosser?

Ann Althouse is having fun with the "recount" in Wisconsin and with JoAnne Kloppenburg's accusations of Republican wrongdoing by correcting a mistake and reporting the actual vote. According to Kloppenburg, this is just not acceptable in Wisconsin. And she has a long list to make it so.

Her list of things that "raise significant questions" about the process in
Waukesha felt long, but what is really on it?

a one-and-a-half day delay in notifying any responsible party about
a county vote total that [the clerk] knew was incorrect


the absence of any reasonable basis for her explanations


the prior knowledge by conservative bloggers


the complete absence of knowledge by the canvass
board until the press conference

It sounded like big list, but there are only 4 items. And 2 of the items are the absence of
anything. An absence of evidence might be probative of something that
matters, but you have to build a foundation for why it matters.

It's sad when one has their own device used against them, especially when it appears they are unable to see the irony. The question is not whether there are fraudulent votes that were cast in Wisconsin, there most probably were some, but who those votes were for.

I'd blame Bush, but that has gotten old even for those on the far left so I'm going with funny boy Franken as the guy to blame because if there weren't enough fraudulent votes for Kloppenburg it's because Franken and Friends (Inc.) weren't paying enough. Dead voters today just don't understand.

Anatomy Of A Moron Who Actually Believes Progressive Crap

Found 'Errors' Means Prosser Win?

Imagine that, errors in Wisconsin ballot counting...

BREAKING: Computer Error Could Give Prosser 7,381 More Votes, Victory

Gee, if this keeps happening people might start thinking that loser Stuart Smalley stole his election. Or maybe that LBJ stole an election or two.  Goodness gracious, people might stoop so low to think that JFK's daddy Joe stole an election.

Desperate Unions & Progressives Use Bigger Lies To Protect Their Racket In WI

Mother Of All Negative Ads Dropped On WI Judicial Race

Progressives in Wisconsin are up with a TV ad that puts the negative in negative campaigning: sitting state Supreme Court Justice David Prosser defends child molesters instead of their victims, the groups say.

"Tell David Prosser judges should protect our children," the ad's narrator states, "not sex offenders."

That this ad is a lie is obvious. That unions would do this is also obvious because they have done this so many times in the past.

They will blatantly lie to win an election through lies and by destroying the reputation of an opponent. It is their M.O. and they will then lie about their lies until they believe people are starting to believe or just get tired of it all.

One of the victims has spoken.